From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: trondmy <trondmy@kernel.org>,
chuck lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, anna <anna@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] sunrpc: inject process namespace into machinename field
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:21:47 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1951524341.2815907.1782483707418.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7290d0262d782c0c3b26b8167975face1ae91053.camel@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3545 bytes --]
Thanks, Jeff. Yes, Chuck has sent me the link too. Indeed, we have
noticed that while tracing some applications with perf.
Chuck as well suggested using the COMPOUND tag, which sounds more
reasonable and will work with RPCSEC_GSS. I will post it after testing.
Best regards,
Tigran.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>
> To: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>, "trondmy" <trondmy@kernel.org>, "chuck lever"
> <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, "anna" <anna@kernel.org>
> Cc: "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Friday, 26 June, 2026 16:04:36
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] sunrpc: inject process namespace into machinename field
> On Fri, 2026-06-26 at 14:52 +0200, Tigran Mkrtchyan wrote:
>> On large shared machines often multiple jobs of a same user run in
>> parallel. For debugging, it's usually impossible to identify requests
>> coming from different processes.
>>
>> The batch systems like HTCondor or SLURM start every job in it's own
>> namespace, thus passing namespace info to the server will help by
>> debugging.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
>> ---
>> net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c
>> index 6c742a3400c4..b218cfa9871a 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>> #include <linux/sunrpc/clnt.h>
>> #include <linux/sunrpc/auth.h>
>> #include <linux/user_namespace.h>
>> +#include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
>>
>>
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
>> @@ -117,6 +118,28 @@ unx_marshal(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)
>> struct group_info *gi = cred->cr_cred->group_info;
>> struct user_namespace *userns = clnt->cl_cred ?
>> clnt->cl_cred->user_ns : &init_user_ns;
>> + char ns_aware_nodename[UNX_MAXNODENAME + 1];
>> + int ns_aware_nodename_len;
>> +
>> + struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
>> +
>> + /* the process runs in a dedicated namespace */
>> + if (pid_ns != &init_pid_ns) {
>
> FYI, Sashiko has some comments on this that seem valid:
>
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260626125216.1467845-2-tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de?part=1
>
> Fetching the user namespace ID might not be correct in some async ops.
>
>
>> + /* Format as: <pid_ns_inum>@<current-hostname> */
>> + int prefix_len = snprintf(ns_aware_nodename, sizeof(ns_aware_nodename),
>> + "%u@", pid_ns->ns.inum);
>> +
>> + if (prefix_len < sizeof(ns_aware_nodename))
>> + strscpy(ns_aware_nodename + prefix_len, clnt->cl_nodename,
>> + sizeof(ns_aware_nodename) - prefix_len);
>> + else
>> + strscpy(ns_aware_nodename, clnt->cl_nodename, sizeof(ns_aware_nodename));
>> +
>> + ns_aware_nodename_len = strlen(ns_aware_nodename);
>> + } else {
>> + ns_aware_nodename_len = clnt->cl_nodelen;
>> + strscpy(ns_aware_nodename, clnt->cl_nodename, sizeof(ns_aware_nodename));
>> + }
>>
>> /* Credential */
>>
>> @@ -126,8 +149,8 @@ unx_marshal(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)
>> *p++ = rpc_auth_unix;
>> cred_len = p++;
>> *p++ = xdr_zero; /* stamp */
>> - if (xdr_stream_encode_opaque(xdr, clnt->cl_nodename,
>> - clnt->cl_nodelen) < 0)
>> + if (xdr_stream_encode_opaque(xdr, ns_aware_nodename,
>> + ns_aware_nodename_len) < 0)
>> goto marshal_failed;
>> p = xdr_reserve_space(xdr, 3 * sizeof(*p));
>> if (!p)
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 2309 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 12:52 [PATCH 0/1] inject process namespace into machinename field Tigran Mkrtchyan
2026-06-26 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] sunrpc: " Tigran Mkrtchyan
2026-06-26 14:04 ` Jeff Layton
2026-06-26 14:21 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1951524341.2815907.1782483707418.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de \
--to=tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox