From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29404 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752700Ab2DZOE7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:04:59 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <4F9088D6.9020203@cs.ucla.edu> References: <4F9088D6.9020203@cs.ucla.edu> <20120419140558.17272.74360.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20120419163238.61D382C0DF@topped-with-meat.com> To: Paul Eggert Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Roland McGrath , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org, kfm-devel@kde.org, nautilus-list@gnome.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Extended file stat system call Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:04:07 +0100 Message-ID: <19638.1335449047@redhat.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Paul Eggert wrote: > On 04/19/2012 09:32 AM, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I have no comment on the functionality. But "xstat" is probably a poor > > choice of name. > > In AIX 7.1 the (similar) function is called statxat instead of xstat. > The API isn't exactly the same, but it's the same basic idea. > Might be worth looking at, not merely to see whether the API > should be the same, but also to borrow good ideas even if not. > > http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/aix/v7r1/topic/com.ibm.aix.basetechref/doc/basetrf2/statx.htm Interesting. I wasn't intending to provide both statx() and statxat() variants, just the latter, in which case I'd've though that -at suffix is redundant. I note that they split their time fields into separate seconds and ns fields, presumably for better packing. David