From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBE468F54 for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 00:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748390918; cv=none; b=sRrPdyLhZ1sTtTn5/MQm0Y2a3WF9ZtJFQpSYpDBnZIZ4WWlw4pq8HJW565SplL+tcL78AhTZ8sH7tlZo/yUQfv0MAZO8Zgx5inGgT2FIujhRUpRdSKCjm1U0pNenb2o2p3CrbXzXomzlDoJ5PcdveO/0LIi7CKlhWVDEBbi0Iws= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748390918; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j/0XsU6Q9cuIXUfcLmtRgtnjkAuyN3cdl5XIeJpdye0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rGN0GGMa/eKbq0ijQ7AyytbAxv4d60v6iOjRJBDD7yIG7dTQMBt8DcGvp5AsaP99D9TD9BNLz6vuCqpE5V3mQkkwHVhlgfzhgGdqAGB1OQS+7Xcsql5zB0GKucoUwdRk1PQ/1hR07IvmI2kZMOU1gEBjSxSj4MyP4MFm4tAw+lU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=blyGnUhz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="blyGnUhz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1748390915; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZUWplp8APHzL0C6wa7FjYaIkogUqyQ4mGEyhMRoLP9M=; b=blyGnUhzhwCWJ2H+gNPtf2Xgg9Gw+Fpy5Xk5hff53OVxcnTOvHQLvNRboPj4wqi0Ber54F HXoT5/etKzuFpXMW1YTyoeU8yJTrXpitbV95YNe/AmoevOLBlVt2eEXjmtDqDAQoePeLPL 9XgMPmxhRKD7vU+KCKufrLscaJpVm5g= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-388-13d66DEuNYWg897C5-J6rA-1; Tue, 27 May 2025 20:08:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 13d66DEuNYWg897C5-J6rA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 13d66DEuNYWg897C5-J6rA_1748390910 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88F871956087; Wed, 28 May 2025 00:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.37.1] (unknown [10.22.58.2]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C625F180047F; Wed, 28 May 2025 00:08:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Benjamin Coddington To: Trond Myklebust Cc: anna@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Support btime and other NFSv4 specific attributes Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 20:08:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1C356965-867D-48B2-BAB1-C63FD6533CE0@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20211227190504.309612-1-trondmy@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 On 27 May 2025, at 17:54, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2025-05-14 at 09:15 -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote: >> Hey Trond and Anna - this series looked ready to go, but seems to >> have never gotten upstream.  Was there a problem that needed work? >> >> I'd like to rebase these and submit them, but will hold off if its a >> non-starter.. >> > > I believe the main issue raised at the time when we submitted all these > attributes was that we had the ioctl() to retrieve and set them. The > request from the community was that we use statx() to retrieve, and > then add a new system call to set them. > > btime already has support in statx(), so there was relatively little > work needed to convert these patches to use it. > > However for the other attributes (Windows Hidden, System, Archive > attributes and the backup time) the main issue was adding the new > system call to set them all. That work is yet to be done due to lack of > developer time. > > If you have time to revive these patches and push the btime changes > upstream, then that would be very welcome from our perspective. I'm > happy to help in any capacity that I can. Great news! I did rebase and post just the btime portion, it needs a v2 so I'll work on moving it along. Ben