From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] sleep_on fixes for lockd
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:38:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040209113824.GA16700@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040209102801.GC21364@suse.de>
Here's another interesting one for you, this time in lockd:
nlmclnt_grace_wait() is completetly unused, removed.
nlmclnt_call() uses sleep_on_interruptible, but doesn't actually check
for signals, I've fixed it to use wait_event_interruptible and check
for signals, but again I'd prefer someone knowledgeable to take look
at what this actually was intended to do..
--- 1.8/fs/lockd/clntproc.c Fri Feb 7 21:25:20 2003
+++ edited/fs/lockd/clntproc.c Sat Feb 7 15:58:42 2004
@@ -195,19 +195,6 @@
}
/*
- * Wait while server is in grace period
- */
-static inline int
-nlmclnt_grace_wait(struct nlm_host *host)
-{
- if (!host->h_reclaiming)
- interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(&host->h_gracewait, 10*HZ);
- else
- interruptible_sleep_on(&host->h_gracewait);
- return signalled()? -ERESTARTSYS : 0;
-}
-
-/*
* Allocate an NLM RPC call struct
*/
struct nlm_rqst *
@@ -254,8 +241,11 @@
msg.rpc_cred = nfs_file_cred(filp);
do {
- if (host->h_reclaiming && !argp->reclaim) {
- interruptible_sleep_on(&host->h_gracewait);
+ status = wait_event_interruptible(host->h_gracewait,
+ (!host->h_reclaiming || argp->reclaim));
+ if (status) {
+ if (signalled())
+ return -EINTR;
continue;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-09 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040207144405.GA19416@lst.de>
2004-02-09 10:28 ` [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on for rpciod Olaf Kirch
2004-02-09 11:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-02-09 20:48 ` [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod trond.myklebust
2004-02-09 21:00 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-10 9:15 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-02-10 11:47 ` trond.myklebust
2004-02-10 1:52 ` [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on for rpciod Greg Banks
2004-02-10 9:18 ` Olaf Kirch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040209113824.GA16700@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=okir@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox