From: Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@web.de>
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: async vs. sync
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:06:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407270006.08581.bernd-schubert@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41055FE5.3030206@bruvoll.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2001 bytes --]
> are you doing anything "interesting" underneath NFS, ie. what are you
> storing your files on?
Its similar to your configuration ;)
> My set-up has about the same performance data, however my big problem is
> that the server dies when I hook all my clients up... Raw throughput
Fortunately that doesn't seem to happen in our case.
> seemed ok, but when you started complaining about the speed, I started
> thinking that my figures weren't all that great anymore.
At least its good to know that we are not alone. Well, I do know about the
performance decrease of sync-exports for a pretty long time, but I was never
sure if its not only a problem of our server (the previous one was a
PII-450).
>
> The set-up is a dual 3Ghz Xeon, 2Gb RAM, and a DRBD-mirrored partition
> sitting on a 3Ware Escalade 7500 to 7200rpm disks. Kernel
Here its a dual opteron, 3GB RAM, adaptec 79xx PCI-X scsi, transtec scsi-ide
raid. Local disk i/o is over 70MB/s. The server is connected with GBit, the
clients only with 100MBit. Here are some performace numbers when the server
was still running 2.6.7:
writing to /worka (async exported): 4 clients, all at full 11MB/s
writing to /home, (sync,no_wdelay exported): 4 clients at 7MB/s
(When I did the tests I was simply to lazy to test with more clients. Actually
I thought that 4 times 7 MB/s is more than sufficient for usual work).
The /home partition is also mirrored via drbd to a failover server, /worka is
not mirrored (mirroring 1.7TB is not that easy as mirroring 200GB ;) ).
So I really don't think that the server performance is the problem.
> 2.4.26-gentoo-r5, everything else newest version. The annoying thing is
> that the server this new set-up is replacing is an old P3/650 that
> easily copes with the load... :-\
Well, as I said, when I tested our old server with sync mounts, it had the
same problem. Are you sure that your old server did not export asynchronous?
Cheers,
Bernd
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-26 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435E51E@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com>
2004-07-26 17:05 ` async vs. sync Bernd Schubert
2004-07-26 19:47 ` Jan Bruvoll
2004-07-26 22:06 ` Bernd Schubert [this message]
2004-07-27 12:00 ` Jan Bruvoll
2004-07-27 13:00 ` Bernd Schubert
2004-07-27 13:56 ` raven
2004-07-27 14:04 ` Jan Bruvoll
2004-07-27 14:11 ` Jan Bruvoll
2004-07-28 8:56 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-07-28 12:35 ` Bernd Schubert
2004-07-28 12:49 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-11-24 19:05 Lever, Charles
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-23 16:36 Lever, Charles
2004-11-23 18:16 ` Dan Stromberg
2004-11-23 14:30 Lever, Charles
2004-11-23 21:46 ` jehan procaccia
2004-11-24 18:45 ` jehan.procaccia
2004-11-24 22:24 ` Neil Brown
2004-11-24 23:14 ` jehan procaccia
2004-11-24 23:34 ` Neil Brown
2004-11-24 22:09 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <Pine.GSO.4.53.0412010900500.5486@int1.cdc.noaa.gov>
2004-12-01 17:27 ` jehan.procaccia
2004-11-23 3:53 Lever, Charles
2004-11-23 16:33 ` Dan Stromberg
2004-11-22 22:14 Lever, Charles
[not found] <20041122214605.8E2B31D0FE1@sc8-sf-uberspam1.sourceforge.net>
2004-11-22 21:57 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2004-11-22 21:50 Lever, Charles
2004-11-22 22:06 ` jehan procaccia
2004-11-23 1:09 ` Dan Stromberg
2004-11-22 19:02 Lever, Charles
2004-11-22 21:25 ` jehan procaccia
2004-11-22 21:45 ` Nicolas.Kowalski
2004-11-22 23:51 ` jehan procaccia
2004-11-22 18:31 Lever, Charles
2004-11-16 18:48 Lever, Charles
2004-11-22 15:36 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-11-22 17:55 ` jehan.procaccia
2004-11-22 18:06 ` Roger Heflin
2004-11-22 18:46 ` jehan.procaccia
2004-11-22 19:10 ` Roger Heflin
2004-11-22 21:44 ` jehan procaccia
2004-11-22 21:52 ` jehan procaccia
2004-11-22 22:20 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-11-22 22:57 ` jehan procaccia
2004-11-23 9:50 ` jehan procaccia
2004-11-23 14:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-11-22 18:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-11-22 18:57 ` jehan.procaccia
2004-11-22 19:05 ` Roger Heflin
2004-11-22 20:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-11-22 21:04 ` Paul Cunningham
2004-11-22 21:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-11-22 22:07 ` Paul Cunningham
2004-11-22 22:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-11-16 18:45 Lever, Charles
2004-11-16 16:15 Lever, Charles
2004-11-16 16:32 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-11-16 17:18 ` jehan.procaccia
2004-11-16 18:08 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435E530@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com>
2004-07-27 15:07 ` Bernd Schubert
2004-07-26 23:05 John Roberts
[not found] <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435E523@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com>
2004-07-26 21:28 ` Bernd Schubert
2004-07-23 16:20 Linux NFS writes to Solaris very, very slow John Roberts
2004-07-26 15:17 ` async vs. sync Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407270006.08581.bernd-schubert@web.de \
--to=bernd-schubert@web.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox