From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: rpc.mountd stops functioning
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:16:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040827231654.GA2836@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16686.43784.910598.870375@cse.unsw.edu.au>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:31:20PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> I don't think this patch is needed (though it wouldn't actually break anything).
> The loop in svc_run.c starts:
>
>
> readfds = svc_fdset;
> cache_set_fds(&readfds);
>
> so readfds is completely initialised at the top of the loop, so
> clearing something at the bottom (which is essentially what this patch
> does) should be a no-op.
>
> Am I wrong?
Note that cache_process_req() (which the patch below modifies) is not
all the way at the bottom of the loop; there's still an importan call to
svc_getreqset() after it.
If I understand the problem correctly, what happens is that if select()
returns with a set that includes two file descriptors, the first for a
cache channel and the second for an rpc socket, and if we don't clear
the first file descriptor from that set before passing it to
svc_getreqset(), then the rpc code will try to read an rpc request from
a cache channel file, and will get very confused.
The symptom is that mountd may die occasionally on a server that's
using the new interface (hence mountd is handling upcalls), and that's
getting a lot of mount requests.
I've never seen the bug myself, because I'm almost always using nfsv4,
hence only use mountd to handle upcalls....
--b.
> > >From Garrick Staples <garrick@usc.edu>:
> >
> > After mountd handles a cache upcall, we should clear the relevant bits in the
> > fd_set.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > nfs-utils-1.0.6-bfields/utils/mountd/cache.c | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff -puN utils/mountd/cache.c~cache_select_bugfix utils/mountd/cache.c
> > --- nfs-utils-1.0.6/utils/mountd/cache.c~cache_select_bugfix 2004-07-14 12:52:57.000000000 -0400
> > +++ nfs-utils-1.0.6-bfields/utils/mountd/cache.c 2004-07-14 12:52:57.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -315,6 +315,7 @@ int cache_process_req(fd_set *readfds)
> > FD_ISSET(fileno(cachelist[i].f), readfds)) {
> > cnt++;
> > cachelist[i].cache_handle(cachelist[i].f);
> > + FD_CLR(fileno(cachelist[i].f), readfds);
> > }
> > }
> > return cnt;
> > _
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
> > Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
> > one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
> > Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-27 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-05 11:19 rpc.mountd stops functioning Johan van den Dorpe
2004-08-05 11:55 ` Johan van den Dorpe
2004-11-25 12:45 ` Johan van den Dorpe
2004-08-05 14:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-08-11 10:02 ` Johan van den Dorpe
2004-08-19 15:26 ` Johan van den Dorpe
2004-08-27 3:31 ` Neil Brown
2004-08-27 23:16 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2004-08-28 17:20 ` Garrick Staples
2004-08-30 5:54 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040827231654.GA2836@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox