From: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
To: Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>
Cc: "Lever, Charles" <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xprt sharing (was Re: xprt_bindresvport)
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 12:31:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041209113107.GE15055@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41B74551.5040908@sun.com>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:17:53PM -0500, Mike Waychison wrote:
> This has been bugging me for a while. The fact that we are limitting
> ourselves to a single nfs mount per port. From what I can tell, Solaris
> shares the transports between nfs mounts from the same server and saves
> themselves a lot of trouble with running out of port numbers in doing so.
Shouldn't we allow NFS mounts to use non-privileged ports? Many
environments don't really care about the "security" provided by privileged
ports, but would be more than happy if they can run with a few hundred
NFS mounts
Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | Things that make Monday morning interesting, #2:
okir@suse.de | "We have 8,000 NFS mount points, why do we keep
---------------+ running out of privileged ports?"
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-09 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-08 14:33 xprt_bindresvport Lever, Charles
2004-12-08 18:17 ` [PATCH] xprt sharing (was Re: xprt_bindresvport) Mike Waychison
2004-12-09 11:31 ` Olaf Kirch [this message]
2004-12-09 13:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-12-09 13:44 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-12-09 16:20 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-12-09 19:34 ` Dan Stromberg
2004-12-09 21:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-12-09 22:29 ` Dan Stromberg
2004-12-09 11:01 ` xprt_bindresvport Olaf Kirch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-08 19:08 [PATCH] xprt sharing (was Re: xprt_bindresvport) Lever, Charles
2004-12-08 21:58 ` Mike Waychison
2004-12-09 11:22 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-12-09 13:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-12-09 13:41 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-12-08 22:00 Lever, Charles
2004-12-09 8:54 Peter Åstrand
2004-12-09 11:14 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-12-09 14:03 Lever, Charles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041209113107.GE15055@suse.de \
--to=okir@suse.de \
--cc=Charles.Lever@netapp.com \
--cc=Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox