From: Christian Robottom Reis <kiko@async.com.br>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@gmx.de>
Cc: , Johan Dahlin <jdahlin@async.com.br>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Performance expectations of NFS
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:54:25 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070126005425.GB29218@anthem.async.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701252350.22255.bernd-schubert@gmx.de>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:21PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> > 0:05 - Server: locally on RAID-5
> > 0:06 - Client: copying from NFS mount to tmpfs
> > 2:31 - Client: Copying from NFS mount to NFS mount
> > (i.e., the simple command above)
> > 3:30 - Client: Copying from NFS mount to NFS mount over an existing
> > tree.
> > 5:08 - Client: Copying from tmpfs to NFS mount
> > 0:48 - Client: Deleting copy of tree on NFS mount
>
> I guess your exports has the "sync" option or your didn't set async or sync
> at all (sync is then the default)? Can you repeat the test again using the
> async option? But please, also read carefully the explanations of "man 5
> exports" about this topic.
This /was/ using the async option. Using sync causes the times to worsen
by about 70% (so the NFS to NFS copy takes about 5 minutes).
> Just for fun, take ethereal and capture some data, once with the async and
> once with the sync option. Now have a look how much time each operation of
> the nfs client takes before it gets confirmed by the server. Especially look
> at the commit calls, once with sync and once with async option.
Yeah, that's a great idea; I should do that tomorrow.
> I guess if one could convince the nfs clients to reduce the number of commit
> calls, write operations would be much much faster. Don't know if that is
> possible at all, though.
I get the feeling that the real bottleneck is synchronous file
creation. What I would like to understand is whether this is done for
reliability or to preserve filesystem semantics.
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-26 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-25 19:31 Performance expectations of NFS Christian Robottom Reis
2007-01-25 22:50 ` Bernd Schubert
2007-01-26 0:54 ` Christian Robottom Reis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070126005425.GB29218@anthem.async.com.br \
--to=kiko@async.com.br \
--cc=bernd-schubert@gmx.de \
--cc=jdahlin@async.com.br \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox