From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Simon Peter <simon.peter@gmx.de>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: Delays on "first" access to a NFS mount
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:29:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070307202949.GH26553@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070307194418.97fee0ec.simon.peter@gmx.de>
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:44:18PM +0100, Simon Peter wrote:
> > > just verified that the server indeed spins up all disks before
> > > answering the request. I thus suspect it is somehow checking all
> > > exports whenever any one export is accessed. Is this correct
> > > behaviour?
> > Hm. If you have the nfs-utils source, you can see there's a loop in
> > nfs-utils/utils/mountd/cache.c:nfsd_fh()
> > that stats the root of each export, in two places; the first it looks
> > like you shouldn't hit if you don't have the mountpoint export option
> > set:
>
> Correct. This one is never hit in my case.
>
> > The second is to figure out which filesystem the filehandle that you
> > passed in that getattr is for:
> > if (stat(exp->m_export.e_path, &stb) != 0)
> > continue;
>
> This is where the wait for the respective disk to spin up occurs.
OK, cool, so we understand the problem.
> > Could we cache the stat information in the export and then
> > double-check it if necessary when there's a match? Or is there some
> > way we could get the kernel to keep that cached for us?
>
> I could certainly cook up a patch for mountd to cache that information
> on its own. I don't have too much clue about how the kernel does its
> cacheing, though. If it's useful to do that directly in mountd, I
> could get my hands on it.
There's two caches involved:
- the filesystem caches attributes so that subsequent stat's of
the exported directory can be answered without having to go to
disk. I guess it's not suprising that that wouldn't be cached
anymore if you hadn't touched the filesystem in a long time.
Though there's one point I'm unclear on: are the directories
you're exporting mountpoints? That's the normal
configuration, and in that case I would've thought the inode
for that directory would be pinned in memory so the stat
wouldn't have to go to disk. I'm probably missing something.
- the filehandle->export mapping that this function tells the
kernel about is cached by nfsd for a half-hour. That time is
set a little later in nfsd_fh:
qword_printint(f, time(0)+30*60);
I don't think there would be any harm to just changing that
time(0)+30*60 to 0x7FFFFFFF (== never expire)--nfs-utils
should be invalidating that cache explicitly whenever it's
needed. Maybe that should be the default.
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-07 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-07 10:23 Delays on "first" access to a NFS mount Simon Peter
2007-03-07 12:38 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 13:22 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 15:06 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 15:10 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 15:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 18:44 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 20:29 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2007-03-07 21:46 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 22:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 23:19 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 22:09 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-08 15:49 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-09 13:02 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-09 14:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 20:31 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 20:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 21:07 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 21:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 21:23 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 21:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 22:37 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 23:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 23:39 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-08 5:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-08 5:42 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-08 13:43 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-03-08 21:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-09 15:02 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-03-16 21:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-16 21:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-16 21:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-07 23:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 23:51 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-08 4:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-08 13:27 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-03-08 21:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 22:15 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 21:40 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 22:17 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 22:36 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 22:48 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 22:56 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 22:12 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 22:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070307202949.GH26553@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=simon.peter@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox