From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
NFS List <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 64 bit ino support for NFS server
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:09:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070806160953.GA8734@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B7410A.3050202@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:40:58AM -0400, Peter Staubach wrote:
> J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:29:10PM -0400, Peter Staubach wrote:
>>> @@ -203,31 +203,15 @@ encode_fattr3(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __
>>> static __be32 *
>>> encode_saved_post_attr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __be32 *p, struct svc_fh
>>> *fhp)
>>> {
>>> - struct inode *inode = fhp->fh_dentry->d_inode;
>>> + if (!fhp->fh_post_saved) {
>>> + *p++ = xdr_zero;
>>> + return p;
>>> + }
>>>
>>
>> The caller, encode_wcc_data(), already did this check.
>
> True. What a twisty maze of small passages, all alike.
>
> The current algorithms don't look quite right to me. I don't
> think that it is valid to return a post_op_attr, which is not
> atomic w.r.t. the operation, even when not returning a pre_op_attr.
> Perhaps a little more cleanup might be good. I will look into
> this.
I *think* the current code is correct, but I agree that it's worth
another check--thanks!
I've also never been really fond of the combined handling of fh_{un}lock
functions that combine the locking and attribute gathering. But maybe
it's just me--I haven't really thought about that code.
>> Dumb question: I assume it's always legal to call ->getattr while
>> holding the i_mutex?
>>
>
> Not so dumb, and I couldn't find an answer to that, either way.
> I couldn't find any reason why it would be illegal, but neither
> did I find explicit reasons for why it would be legal.
>
> Does anyone else know? This gets into the lack of complete
> definition for the virtual file system layer...
There's a useful file Documentation/filesystems/Locking. It has a table
that explains which operations take the i_mutex and which don't. I
assume that a "no" in the table means that function isn't usually called
with the i_mutex, not that it necessarily *must* not be. But I could be
wrong.
That table could use a caption....
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-06 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-03 19:11 [PATCH] 64 bit ino support for NFS server Peter Staubach
2007-08-03 19:29 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-04 22:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-06 15:40 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-06 16:09 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2007-08-08 20:07 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-08 20:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-08 20:49 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-08 21:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-16 16:10 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-17 16:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-17 18:30 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-17 18:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070806160953.GA8734@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=staubach@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox