From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/38] svc: Add an svc transport class Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:01:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20071218150143.GE14783@fieldses.org> References: <20071213184506.GA29496@fieldses.org> <20071217174535.GA13515@fieldses.org> <1197937584.13463.44.camel@trinity.ogc.int> <20071218145419.GC14783@fieldses.org> <1197990256.13463.54.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: NeilBrown , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Tom Tucker Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:58837 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755662AbXLRPBw (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:01:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1197990256.13463.54.camel-SMNkleLxa3ZimH42XvhXlA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:04:16AM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 09:54 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:26:24PM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote: > > > I've coded all of the changes that you suggested and built a new > > > patchset. Besides the tests I outlined in my "test matrix" are there any > > > other tests you would like to see performed? > > > > krb5p testing might still be interesting. > > > > I'll add it to my matrix. It will take some time to set up though since > I don't have a KDC or anything set up. Are we under any time > constraints? For krb5p, I don't think it's terifically urgent. > > > I could not reproduce the BUG_ON from Bull. I'm wondering if it's a PPC > > > issue :-\ > > > > Hm, too bad, I'd like to understand that one. > > > > Yeah, and I'm having a hard time believing it's PPC related. I think I'm > missing something, I'll keep looking. Thanks! --b.