From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NLM: hold BKL when clearing global lockd task and serv vars
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:50:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080407205027.GE11219@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080407162241.0a06fd6f@tleilax.poochiereds.net>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 04:22:41PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:56:15 -0400
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:45:01PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 09:38:34AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > The global task and serv pointers for lockd are normally protected by
> > > > the nlmsvc_mutex. The exception is when the lockd exits abnormally. When
> > > > this occurs, these variables are cleared without any locking.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't we get rid of the case where it exits abnormally instead?
> >
> > I tried to figure out when this could actually occur (when can
> > svc_recv() return an error other than -EINTR or -EAGAIN?), and got lost
> > in sock_recvmsg():
> >
> > - svc_recv() itself returns only -EAGAIN or the return from
> > ->xpo_recvfrom().
> > - the only xpo_recvfrom() that's interesting is
> > svc_tcp_recvfrom(), which can return the error it gets from
> > svc_recvfrom(), which can return the error from
> > kernel_recvmsg(), which gets its return from sock_recvmsg().
> >
> > Since __sock_recvmsg() has a security hook, it looks like we can end up
> > with an -EACCES from selinux?
> >
> > So one case would be selinux deciding we weren't allowed to receive
> > packets from this socket. Huh.
>
> I got lost there too, but I would suspect that there are other errors
> that can bubble up from the lower networking layers as well. Even if
> there aren't currently, it's probably still prudent to assume that it's
> a possibility and code for it.
>
> I tend to think the safest thing is probably to do a long sleep (1s or
> so and retry when we get an error (maybe also a ratelimited printk?).
Yeah, I guess I can't think of anything better.
--b.
> It's unlikely to do any harm (other than a few wasted CPU cycles), and
> if the error is transient then we have the possibility to recover and
> continue normal operation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-07 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-07 13:38 [PATCH] NFS: hold BKL when clearing nfs_callback_info.task Jeff Layton
2008-04-07 13:38 ` [PATCH] NLM: hold BKL when clearing global lockd task and serv vars Jeff Layton
2008-04-07 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-07 17:40 ` Jeff Layton
2008-04-07 17:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-04-07 19:08 ` Tom Tucker
2008-04-07 20:22 ` Jeff Layton
2008-04-07 20:50 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-04-08 13:21 ` Jeff Layton
2008-04-08 16:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-04-08 17:02 ` Jeff Layton
2008-04-08 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2008-04-08 20:08 ` Chuck Lever
2008-04-08 20:20 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080407205027.GE11219@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox