From: Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Linux NFS mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exportfs: fix incorrect EACCES in reconnect_path()
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 10:52:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080503085205.GB26931@janus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209744293.8294.19.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:04:53PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 11:56 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> > > > A privileged process on an NFS client which drops privileges after using
> > > > them to change the current working directory, will experience incorrect
> > > > EACCES after an NFS server reboot. This problem can also occur after
> > > > memory pressure on the server, particularly when the client side is
> > > > quiet for some time.
> > > >
> > > > This patch removes the x-bit check during dentry tree reconstruction at
> > > > the server by exportfs on behalf of nfsd.
> > >
> > > I'm still against adding this crap,
> >
> > The only statements I've seen against the change so far have been of the
> > form "you should not do that", without explaining why not.
> >
> > It's entirely possible that you're right, but I need some argument.
>
>
> AFAICS, the real problem here is that nfsd is dropping its privileged
> mode too early. Why can't you call reconnect_path() using nfsd's root
> permissions instead of dropping permissions checks altogether?
>
> > > and even when I get overruled that
> > > doesn't make the comments on lookup_one_noperm any less true,
> >
> > We do need to at least update it to reflect the addition of a new
> > caller.
> >
> > > not does it give you a permit to break the kerneldoc generation.
> >
> > Oops; here's a version that should make kerneldoc happy. It also adds a
> > little more explanation, and leaves alone the editorializing on sysfs
> > (on which I have no opinion).
> >
> > --b.
> >
> > commit ccdfe77dc49a07c298bb9e2107290267492f16b3
> > Author: Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>
> > Date: Fri May 2 17:16:46 2008 +0200
> >
> > exportfs: fix incorrect EACCES in reconnect_path()
> >
> > A privileged process on an NFS client which drops privileges after using
> > them to change the current working directory, will experience incorrect
> > EACCES after an NFS server reboot. This problem can also occur after
> > memory pressure on the server, particularly when the client side is
> > quiet for some time.
> >
> > This patch removes the x-bit check during dentry tree reconstruction at
> > the server by exportfs on behalf of nfsd.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/exportfs/expfs.c b/fs/exportfs/expfs.c
> > index 109ab5e..89dc7ae 100644
> > --- a/fs/exportfs/expfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/exportfs/expfs.c
> > @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ reconnect_path(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *target_dir)
> > }
> > dprintk("%s: found name: %s\n", __FUNCTION__, nbuf);
> > mutex_lock(&ppd->d_inode->i_mutex);
> > - npd = lookup_one_len(nbuf, ppd, strlen(nbuf));
> > + npd = lookup_one_noperm(nbuf, ppd);
> > mutex_unlock(&ppd->d_inode->i_mutex);
> > if (IS_ERR(npd)) {
> > err = PTR_ERR(npd);
> > @@ -447,8 +447,7 @@ struct dentry *exportfs_decode_fh(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct fid *fid,
> > err = exportfs_get_name(mnt, target_dir, nbuf, result);
> > if (!err) {
> > mutex_lock(&target_dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
> > - nresult = lookup_one_len(nbuf, target_dir,
> > - strlen(nbuf));
> > + nresult = lookup_one_noperm(nbuf, target_dir);
> > mutex_unlock(&target_dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
> > if (!IS_ERR(nresult)) {
> > if (nresult->d_inode) {
> > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> > index e179f71..c00150c 100644
> > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > @@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ struct dentry *lookup_one_len(const char *name, struct dentry *base, int len)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * lookup_one_noperm - bad hack for sysfs
> > + * lookup_one_noperm - bad hack for sysfs and nfsd
> > * @name: pathname component to lookup
> > * @base: base directory to lookup from
> > *
> > @@ -1399,7 +1399,12 @@ struct dentry *lookup_one_len(const char *name, struct dentry *base, int len)
> > * checks. It's a horrible hack to work around the braindead sysfs
> > * architecture and should not be used anywhere else.
> > *
> > - * DON'T USE THIS FUNCTION EVER, thanks.
> > + * It is also used by nfsd via exports to reconstruct the dentry tree
> > + * for directory handles (e.g. when a client requests a directory by
> > + * filehandle after a server reboot has cleared the dentry cache of that
> > + * directory's parents).
> > + *
> > + * DON'T USE THIS FUNCTION ANYWHERE ELSE, thanks.
> > */
> > struct dentry *lookup_one_noperm(const char *name, struct dentry *base)
> > {
>
> How about if exportfs is compiled as a module?
Good point. The patch should include a EXPORT_SYMBOL(lookup_one_noperm)
in fs/namei.c if we decide to fix it this way.
--
Frank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-03 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 10:24 reconnect_path() breaks NFS server causing occasional EACCES Frank van Maarseveen
2008-04-07 18:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-04-07 19:55 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-04-09 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-09 14:11 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-04-09 16:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-04-29 5:20 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <18454.45086.254692.412079-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-29 16:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-04-29 17:40 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-04-30 17:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-02 15:16 ` [PATCH] exportfs: fix incorrect EACCES in reconnect_path() Frank van Maarseveen
2008-05-02 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-02 15:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-02 16:04 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1209744293.8294.19.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-02 22:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-04 23:22 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <18462.17737.353976.999538-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-05 17:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-06 0:35 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <18463.42978.531115.344884-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-06 19:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-08 3:03 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <18466.28013.258338.485948-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-09 4:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-09 10:11 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-06-29 19:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-03 8:52 ` Frank van Maarseveen [this message]
2008-04-30 23:29 ` reconnect_path() breaks NFS server causing occasional EACCES Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080503085205.GB26931@janus \
--to=frankvm@frankvm.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox