From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/05] svcrdma: Refactor RDMA_WRITE dma mapping logic
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 20:46:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080521004608.GL8177@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1211156002624-git-send-email-tom@opengridcomputing.com>
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:13:18PM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
> In order to make the dma mapping code easier to understand and reduce=
the
> number of I/O contexts required, move the DMA for RDMA_WRITE WR to th=
e
> code that prepares the WR SGE.
This one makes my (32-bit) compiler whine:
CC net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.o
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c: In function =E2=80=98send_write=E2=
=80=99:
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c:180: warning: passing argument 2 =
of =E2=80=98ib_dma_map_single=E2=80=99 makes pointer from integer witho=
ut a cast
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c: In function =E2=80=98send_reply=E2=
=80=99:
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c:416: warning: passing argument 2 =
of =E2=80=98ib_dma_map_single=E2=80=99 makes pointer from integer witho=
ut a cast
And the types do seem weird:
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
>=20
> ---
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c | 44 +++++++++++++++-----=
----------
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 5 +++-
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtr=
dma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
> index fb82b1b..85931c4 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
> @@ -84,10 +84,7 @@ static struct ib_sge *xdr_to_sge(struct svcxprt_rd=
ma *xprt,
> sge_no =3D 1;
> =20
> /* Head SGE */
> - sge[sge_no].addr =3D ib_dma_map_single(xprt->sc_cm_id->device,
> - xdr->head[0].iov_base,
> - xdr->head[0].iov_len,
> - DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + sge[sge_no].addr =3D (unsigned long)xdr->head[0].iov_base;
So before we called a function that took a void *, returned a u64; now
we're storing a void* directly into a u64.
> sge_bytes =3D min_t(u32, byte_count, xdr->head[0].iov_len);
> byte_count -=3D sge_bytes;
> sge[sge_no].length =3D sge_bytes;
> @@ -99,11 +96,9 @@ static struct ib_sge *xdr_to_sge(struct svcxprt_rd=
ma *xprt,
> page_bytes =3D xdr->page_len;
> page_off =3D xdr->page_base;
> while (byte_count && page_bytes) {
> + sge[sge_no].addr =3D (unsigned long)
> + page_address(xdr->pages[page_no]) + page_off;
> sge_bytes =3D min_t(u32, byte_count, (PAGE_SIZE-page_off));
> - sge[sge_no].addr =3D
> - ib_dma_map_page(xprt->sc_cm_id->device,
> - xdr->pages[page_no], page_off,
> - sge_bytes, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> sge_bytes =3D min(sge_bytes, page_bytes);
> byte_count -=3D sge_bytes;
> page_bytes -=3D sge_bytes;
> @@ -117,11 +112,7 @@ static struct ib_sge *xdr_to_sge(struct svcxprt_=
rdma *xprt,
> =20
> /* Tail SGE */
> if (byte_count && xdr->tail[0].iov_len) {
> - sge[sge_no].addr =3D
> - ib_dma_map_single(xprt->sc_cm_id->device,
> - xdr->tail[0].iov_base,
> - xdr->tail[0].iov_len,
> - DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + sge[sge_no].addr =3D (unsigned long)xdr->tail[0].iov_base;
> sge_bytes =3D min_t(u32, byte_count, xdr->tail[0].iov_len);
> byte_count -=3D sge_bytes;
> sge[sge_no].length =3D sge_bytes;
> @@ -145,7 +136,6 @@ static int send_write(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt, =
struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> u32 xdr_off, int write_len,
> struct ib_sge *xdr_sge, int sge_count)
> {
> - struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt *tmp_sge_ctxt;
> struct ib_send_wr write_wr;
> struct ib_sge *sge;
> int xdr_sge_no;
> @@ -163,9 +153,8 @@ static int send_write(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt, =
struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> write_len, xdr_sge, sge_count);
> =20
> ctxt =3D svc_rdma_get_context(xprt);
> - ctxt->count =3D 0;
> - tmp_sge_ctxt =3D svc_rdma_get_context(xprt);
> - sge =3D tmp_sge_ctxt->sge;
> + ctxt->direction =3D DMA_TO_DEVICE;
> + sge =3D ctxt->sge;
> =20
> /* Find the SGE associated with xdr_off */
> for (bc =3D xdr_off, xdr_sge_no =3D 1; bc && xdr_sge_no < sge_count=
;
> @@ -181,14 +170,20 @@ static int send_write(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt=
, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> =20
> /* Copy the remaining SGE */
> while (bc !=3D 0 && xdr_sge_no < sge_count) {
> - sge[sge_no].addr =3D xdr_sge[xdr_sge_no].addr + sge_off;
> sge[sge_no].lkey =3D xdr_sge[xdr_sge_no].lkey;
> sge_bytes =3D min((size_t)bc,
> (size_t)(xdr_sge[xdr_sge_no].length-sge_off));
> sge[sge_no].length =3D sge_bytes;
> -
> + sge[sge_no].addr =3D
> + ib_dma_map_single(xprt->sc_cm_id->device,
> + (void *)
> + xdr_sge[xdr_sge_no].addr + sge_off,
> + sge_bytes, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(sge[sge_no].addr))
> + return -EINVAL;
And then here we're casting the u64 back to a void *. Also, we're
adding sge_off to the input, instead of to the result. Is it true that
that
ib_dma_map_single(., x + sge_off, ., .)
and
ib_dma_map_single(., x, ., .) + sge_off
always have the same result?
--b.
> sge_off =3D 0;
> sge_no++;
> + ctxt->count++;
> xdr_sge_no++;
> bc -=3D sge_bytes;
> }
> @@ -210,11 +205,10 @@ static int send_write(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt=
, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> /* Post It */
> atomic_inc(&rdma_stat_write);
> if (svc_rdma_send(xprt, &write_wr)) {
> - svc_rdma_put_context(ctxt, 1);
> + svc_rdma_put_context(ctxt, 0);
> /* Fatal error, close transport */
> ret =3D -EIO;
> }
> - svc_rdma_put_context(tmp_sge_ctxt, 0);
> return ret;
> }
> =20
> @@ -417,6 +411,11 @@ static int send_reply(struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
> sge_bytes =3D min((size_t)ctxt->sge[sge_no].length,
> (size_t)byte_count);
> byte_count -=3D sge_bytes;
> + ctxt->sge[sge_no].addr =3D
> + ib_dma_map_single(rdma->sc_cm_id->device,
> + (void *)
> + ctxt->sge[sge_no].addr,
> + sge_bytes, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> }
> BUG_ON(byte_count !=3D 0);
> =20
> @@ -428,8 +427,9 @@ static int send_reply(struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
> ctxt->pages[page_no+1] =3D rqstp->rq_respages[page_no];
> ctxt->count++;
> rqstp->rq_respages[page_no] =3D NULL;
> + if (page_no+1 >=3D sge_no)
> + ctxt->sge[page_no+1].length =3D 0;
> }
> -
> BUG_ON(sge_no > rdma->sc_max_sge);
> memset(&send_wr, 0, sizeof send_wr);
> ctxt->wr_op =3D IB_WR_SEND;
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xp=
rtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> index e132509..9e9e244 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> @@ -361,10 +361,13 @@ static void sq_cq_reap(struct svcxprt_rdma *xpr=
t)
> =20
> switch (ctxt->wr_op) {
> case IB_WR_SEND:
> - case IB_WR_RDMA_WRITE:
> svc_rdma_put_context(ctxt, 1);
> break;
> =20
> + case IB_WR_RDMA_WRITE:
> + svc_rdma_put_context(ctxt, 0);
> + break;
> +
> case IB_WR_RDMA_READ:
> if (test_bit(RDMACTXT_F_LAST_CTXT, &ctxt->flags)) {
> struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt *read_hdr =3D ctxt->read_hdr;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-21 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <12111560011694-git-send-email-tom@opengridcomputing.com>
[not found] ` <12111560022506-git-send-email-tom@opengridcomputing.com>
2008-05-19 18:20 ` [PATCH 01/05] svcrdma: Verify read-list fits within RPCSVC_MAXPAGES J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-20 1:07 ` Tom Tucker
[not found] ` <1211245672.31725.111.camel-SMNkleLxa3ZimH42XvhXlA@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-20 13:27 ` Talpey, Thomas
[not found] ` <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDh133t00000127-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-20 13:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-20 14:14 ` Talpey, Thomas
[not found] ` <1211156002624-git-send-email-tom@opengridcomputing.com>
[not found] ` <12111560022695-git-send-email-tom@opengridcomputing.com>
[not found] ` <12111560022073-git-send-email-tom@opengridcomputing.com>
[not found] ` <12111560023250-git-send-email-tom@opengridcomputing.com>
2008-05-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 05/05] svcrdma: Add dma map count and WARN_ON J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-19 19:27 ` Tom Tucker
2008-05-21 0:46 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-05-21 2:52 ` [PATCH 02/05] svcrdma: Refactor RDMA_WRITE dma mapping logic J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-21 10:33 ` Tom Tucker
2008-05-25 19:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080521004608.GL8177@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox