From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: connectathon test failures
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:23:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081009192352.GB482@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1223573773.7494.21.camel@localhost>
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 01:36:13PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> OK. Having thought a little bit more about this, I think we can just
> delete the wraparound protection in nfs_update_inode(). We already have
> similar protection in nfs_inode_attrs_need_update()...
I retested with this patch, and it passed. Thanks!
--b.
>
> Cheers
> Trond
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:27:55 -0400
> NFS: Fix attribute updates
>
> This fixes a regression seen when running the Connectathon testsuite
> against an ext3 filesystem. The reason was that the inode was constantly
> being marked as 'just updated' by the jiffy wraparound test.
> This again meant that newer GETATTR calls were failing to pass the
> nfs_inode_attrs_need_update() test unless the changes caused a ctime update
> on the server, since they were perceived as having been started before the
> latest inode update.
>
> Given that nfs_inode_attrs_need_update() already checks for wraparound
> of nfsi->last_updated, we can drop the buggy "protection" in
> nfs_update_inode().
>
> Also make a slight micro-optimisation of nfs_inode_attrs_need_update(): we
> are more often going to see time_after(fattr->time_start, nfsi->last_updated)
> be true, rather than seeing an update of ctime/size, so put that test
> first to ensure that we optimise away the ctime/size tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> ---
>
> fs/nfs/inode.c | 13 ++++---------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> index e25009f..6554281 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> @@ -933,10 +933,10 @@ static int nfs_inode_attrs_need_update(const struct inode *inode, const struct n
> {
> const struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
>
> - return nfs_ctime_need_update(inode, fattr) ||
> - nfs_size_need_update(inode, fattr) ||
> - time_after(fattr->time_start, nfsi->last_updated) ||
> - time_after(nfsi->last_updated, jiffies);
> + return time_after(fattr->time_start, nfsi->last_updated) ||
> + nfs_ctime_need_update(inode, fattr) ||
> + nfs_size_need_update(inode, fattr) ||
> + time_after(nfsi->last_updated, jiffies);
> }
>
> static int nfs_refresh_inode_locked(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> @@ -1167,11 +1167,6 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> nfsi->attrtimeo = NFS_MAXATTRTIMEO(inode);
> nfsi->attrtimeo_timestamp = now;
> }
> - /*
> - * Avoid jiffy wraparound issues with nfsi->last_updated
> - */
> - if (!time_in_range(nfsi->last_updated, nfsi->read_cache_jiffies, now))
> - nfsi->last_updated = nfsi->read_cache_jiffies;
> }
> invalid &= ~NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR;
> /* Don't invalidate the data if we were to blame */
>
>
> --
> Trond Myklebust
> Linux NFS client maintainer
>
> NetApp
> Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
> www.netapp.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-09 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-08 22:55 connectathon test failures J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-09 2:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-09 2:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-09 14:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-10-09 15:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-09 17:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-10-09 19:23 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081009192352.GB482@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox