From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Change error handling in _get_posix_acl and it's callers
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:12:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081022201245.GA5572@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081022181753.GC2495@fieldses.org>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:17:53PM -0400, bfields wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:48:48PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> > From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
> >
> > Change _get_posix_acl to return NULL on buflen == 0, and change users of
> > this function to handle error cases.
>
> OK, the code's certainly simpler. Makes sense. Applied to for-2.6.29.
Whoops! Sorry, spoke to soon--dropped. This breaks some ACL-related
newpynfs tests:
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/pynfs/
The assumption that nfsd_getxattr leaves *buf untouched is probably
wrong. At the least, there's a race here--something could change
between the two calls to vfs_getxattr(), though that's not the case I'm
seeing. The filesystem may just be giving a high estimate for the
buflen in the first call.
--b.
> > {
> > void *buf = NULL;
> > - struct posix_acl *pacl = NULL;
> > + struct posix_acl *pacl;
> > int buflen;
> >
> > buflen = nfsd_getxattr(dentry, key, &buf);
> > - if (!buflen)
> > - buflen = -ENODATA;
> > - if (buflen <= 0)
> > + if (buflen < 0)
> > return ERR_PTR(buflen);
> >
> > pacl = posix_acl_from_xattr(buf, buflen);
> > @@ -526,7 +524,7 @@ nfsd4_get_nfs4_acl(struct svc_rqst *rqst
> > unsigned int flags = 0;
> >
> > pacl = _get_posix_acl(dentry, POSIX_ACL_XATTR_ACCESS);
> > - if (IS_ERR(pacl) && PTR_ERR(pacl) == -ENODATA)
> > + if (!pacl)
> > pacl = posix_acl_from_mode(inode->i_mode, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (IS_ERR(pacl)) {
> > error = PTR_ERR(pacl);
> > @@ -536,9 +534,7 @@ nfsd4_get_nfs4_acl(struct svc_rqst *rqst
> >
> > if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> > dpacl = _get_posix_acl(dentry, POSIX_ACL_XATTR_DEFAULT);
> > - if (IS_ERR(dpacl) && PTR_ERR(dpacl) == -ENODATA)
> > - dpacl = NULL;
> > - else if (IS_ERR(dpacl)) {
> > + if (IS_ERR(dpacl)) {
> > error = PTR_ERR(dpacl);
> > dpacl = NULL;
> > goto out;
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-22 9:18 [PATCH] nfsd: Fix memory leak in nfsd_getxattr Krishna Kumar
[not found] ` <20081022091836.22100.57827.sendpatchset-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-22 9:18 ` [PATCH] nfsd: Change error handling in _get_posix_acl and it's callers Krishna Kumar
[not found] ` <20081022091848.22100.80769.sendpatchset-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-22 18:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-22 20:12 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-10-22 18:11 ` [PATCH] nfsd: Fix memory leak in nfsd_getxattr J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081022201245.GA5572@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox