From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>,
Linux NFS mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [NLM] 2.6.27 broken
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:33:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204233348.GD20917@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081216201610.GE18928@fieldses.org>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:16:10PM -0500, bfields wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:43:52PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 12:39 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > More precisely, it looks like this started with
> > >
> > > bde74e4bc64415b142e "locks: add special return value for
> > > asynchronous locks"
> > >
> > > But I haven't had the chance to look any harder yet. Miklos? Is this
> > > easy for you to reproduce?
> >
> > Not immediately, at the moment I don't have NFS set up. But if you
> > don't beat me to it, I'll look into this.
>
> OK, thanks. I'll take another look too when I get the chance, so let me
> know of any partial result.
>
> It may just for example be returning the wrong error to the client on an
> nlm blocking lock request, so that the client assumes the lock is gone
> and goes away rather than waiting for a grant request.
Sorry, I've gotten a bit backlogged, but I finally got back to this. If
there's no objections, the following is what I intend to submit.
--b.
commit cb8b864ea6addd3a3e72fe835aafecec63f06cbd
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields-+qGSg9AQ1cLTsXDwO4sDpg@public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed Feb 4 17:35:38 2009 -0500
lockd: fix regression in lockd's handling of blocked locks
If a client requests a blocking lock, is denied, then requests it again,
then here in nlmsvc_lock() we will call vfs_lock_file() without FL_SLEEP
set, because we've already queued a block and don't need the locks code
to do it again.
But that means vfs_lock_file() will return -EAGAIN instead of
FILE_LOCK_DENIED. So we still need to translate that -EAGAIN return
into a nlm_lck_blocked error in this case, and put ourselves back on
lockd's block list.
The bug was introduced by bde74e4bc64415b1 "locks: add special return
value for asynchronous locks".
Thanks to From: Frank van Maarseveen for the report; his original test
case was essentially
for i in `seq 30`; do flock /nfsmount/foo sleep 10 & done
Cc: Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index 6063a8e..763b78a 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
goto out;
case -EAGAIN:
ret = nlm_lck_denied;
- goto out;
+ break;
case FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED:
if (wait)
break;
@@ -443,6 +443,10 @@ nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
goto out;
}
+ ret = nlm_lck_denied;
+ if (!wait)
+ goto out;
+
ret = nlm_lck_blocked;
/* Append to list of blocked */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-15 13:28 [NLM] 2.6.27 broken Frank van Maarseveen
2008-11-20 22:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-11-28 11:24 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-12-16 17:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-12-16 19:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-12-16 20:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-02-04 23:33 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-02-05 10:21 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2009-02-05 19:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-02-05 10:47 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-02-05 19:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-02-06 11:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-02-09 18:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-02-09 20:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-02-09 20:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090204233348.GD20917@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=frankvm@frankvm.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox