From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [pnfs] [PATCH v2 06/47] nfsd41: Add Kconfig symbols for NFSv4.1 Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:22:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20090402142256.GF24124@fieldses.org> References: <1238229069-8636-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@panasas.com> <20090401043301.GA29339@fieldses.org> <49D32659.8040207@panasas.com> <20090401131022.GA4002@fieldses.org> <49D3752E.7060708@panasas.com> <49D38924.9020105@panasas.com> <49D482F6.5090000@panasas.com> <20090402132742.GA24124@fieldses.org> <49D4C19F.7090608@panasas.com> <1238681800.6191.5.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Benny Halevy , Steve Dickson , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, pnfs@linux-nfs.org To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([141.211.133.115]:44302 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756382AbZDBOXA (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:23:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1238681800.6191.5.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:16:40AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 16:46 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > > On Apr. 02, 2009, 16:27 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:18:46PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > > >> On Apr. 01, 2009, 18:32 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > > >>> On Apr. 01, 2009, 17:07 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > > >>>> On Apr. 01, 2009, 16:10 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:31:21AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > > >>>>>> On Apr. 01, 2009, 7:33 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:31:09AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > > >>>>>>>> Added CONFIG_NFSD_V4_1 and made it depend upon NFSD_V4 and EXPERIMENTAL > > >>>>>>>> Indicate that CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 is for NFS developers at the moment > > >>>>>>> Stupid question: do we need CONFIG_NFSD_V4_1 at all? How many people > > >>>>>>> will want to build a kernel with v4.0 but not v4.1? > > >> Bruce, with the patch below in place, would it be reasonable to > > >> remove CONFIG_NFSD_V4_1? > > > > > > It would be fine with me, but perhaps queuing that up as a separate > > > patch for 2.6.31 would be better than doing it at the last moment. > > > > It's not too hard to get rid of it now. > > I think it might be better than introducing a new config item > > to be removed in the next version. > > > > Trond, please speak up if you want to remove CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 as well. > > On the client side minorversion 1 will be used only if the user > > explicitly asked for it with mount -o minorversion=1. > > I'd feel more comfortable with being able to compile it out until the > stability of the code has been established. I'd certainly want to be > able to do that on the server side, since it has no other means to > restrict the protocol version should it turn out that NFSv4.1 has some > fatal condition. I think it's acceptable given an interface that allows choosing the supported minorversion at runtime (and that defaults 4.1 to off). --b.