From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg Banks <gnb-xTcybq6BZ68@public.gmane.org>,
jlayton@redhat.com, Krishna Kumar <krikku@gmail.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/11] nfsd: CHANGE old function calls to new calls
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:25:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090424192506.GQ17365@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFBB4FF305.DD2B4946-ON652575A2.005CB412-652575A2.005D3AC2@in.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:28:18PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote on 04/24/2009 09:53:21 PM:
>
> > > {
> > > __u32 a = auth[0], b = auth[1], c = auth[2], d = auth[3];
> > > hash = jhash_3words(a, b, jhash_2words(c, d, 0), 0xfeedbeef) &
> > > FHPARM_HASH_MASK;
> > > ...
> > > /*
> > > * Matching check uses something like:
> > > * if (fh->p_auth1 == a && fh->p_auth2 == b && fh->p_auth3 == c
> &&
> > > fh->p_auth4 == d)
> > > */
> > > }
> > >
> > > Is what you had in mind? I am testing some more with this, so far I get
> > > different values for different files and filesystems.
> > >
> > > I am not sure if there is an easier way to do a hash and get the unique
> > > file
> > > associated with the filehandle, this part of the code is very
> complicated.
> >
> > Why not just do a hash on the entire filehandle, however long it may be?
>
> I am not sure how many numbers to hash on, usually the first 4 numbers are
> the
> ino, inode generation, parent inode, parent inode generation, etc, and is a
> unique match. Or filesystems can have their own encode handlers but store
> similar stuff in these indices. I guess a memcmp could also be done if I
> know
> the length of the auth being used.
Why not use the whole thing?:
fh1->fh_size == fh2->fh_size
&& memcmp(fh1->fh_base, fh2->fh_base, fh1->fh_size) == 0
--b.
>
> > (Cc'ing Greg since he says he had some patches which did something
> > similar, and perhaps he could offer a suggestion.)
>
> OK, will wait for response from Greg.
>
> thanks,
>
> - KK
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-24 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090325133607.16437.33288.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20090325133607.16437.33288.sendpatchset-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-17 18:46 ` [PATCH 0/11] nfsd: Summary of "Improve NFS server performance" J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-17 19:30 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-04-21 22:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-22 5:35 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-04-22 19:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20090325133628.16437.11092.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20090325133628.16437.11092.sendpatchset-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-21 22:48 ` [PATCH 1/11] nfsd: ADD data structure infrastructure J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-22 5:36 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-04-22 19:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-21 23:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20090325133647.16437.59567.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20090325133647.16437.59567.sendpatchset-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-22 2:54 ` [PATCH 2/11] nfsd: ADD new function infrastructure J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-22 5:37 ` Krishna Kumar2
[not found] ` <20090325133707.16437.66360.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20090325133707.16437.66360.sendpatchset-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-22 20:05 ` [PATCH 3/11] nfsd: CHANGE old function calls to new calls J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-23 15:55 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-04-23 22:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-24 16:17 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-04-24 16:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-24 16:58 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-04-24 19:25 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-04-26 11:16 ` Krishna Kumar2
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090424192506.GQ17365@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=gnb-xTcybq6BZ68@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=krikku@gmail.com \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox