public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] lockd: Update NSM state from SM_MON replies
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:25:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428162524.GI17891@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090423233332.17283.23011.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:33:33PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> When rpc.statd starts up in user space at boot time, it attempts to
> write the latest NSM local state number into
> /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nsm_local_state.
> 
> If lockd.ko isn't loaded yet (as is the case in most configurations),
> that file doesn't exist, thus the kernel's NSM state remains set to
> its initial value of zero during lockd operation.
> 
> This is a problem because rpc.statd and lockd use the NSM state number
> to prevent repeated lock recovery on rebooted hosts.  If lockd sends
> a zero NSM state, but then a delayed SM_NOTIFY with a real NSM state
> number is received, there is no way for lockd or rpc.statd to
> distinguish that stale SM_NOTIFY from an actual reboot.  Thus lock
> recovery could be performed after the rebooted host has already
> started reclaiming locks, and those locks will be lost.
> 
> We could change /etc/init.d/nfslock so it always modprobes lockd.ko
> before starting rpc.statd.  However, if lockd.ko is ever unloaded
> and reloaded, we are back at square one, since the NSM state is not
> preserved across an unload/reload cycle.  This may happen frequently
> on clients that use automounter.  A period of NFS inactivity causes
> lockd.ko to be unloaded, and the kernel loses its NSM state setting.

Aie.  Can we also fix the automounter or some other part of the
userspace configuration?

> Instead, let's use the fact that rpc.statd plants the local system's
> NSM state in every SM_MON (and SM_UNMON) reply.  lockd performs a
> synchronous SM_MON upcall to the local rpc.statd _before_ sending its
> first NLM request to a new remote.  This would permit rpc.statd to
> provide the current NSM state to lockd, even after lockd.ko had been
> unloaded and reloaded.
> 
> Note that NLMPROC_LOCK arguments are constructed before the
> nsm_monitor() call, so we have to rearrange argument construction very
> slightly to make this all work out.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
> 
>  fs/lockd/clntproc.c |    2 +-
>  fs/lockd/mon.c      |    6 +++++-
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
> index dd79570..f55b900 100644
> --- a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
> +++ b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ static void nlmclnt_setlockargs(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
>  	struct nlm_lock	*lock = &argp->lock;
>  
>  	nlmclnt_next_cookie(&argp->cookie);
> -	argp->state   = nsm_local_state;
>  	memcpy(&lock->fh, NFS_FH(fl->fl_file->f_path.dentry->d_inode), sizeof(struct nfs_fh));
>  	lock->caller  = utsname()->nodename;
>  	lock->oh.data = req->a_owner;
> @@ -519,6 +518,7 @@ nlmclnt_lock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
>  
>  	if (nsm_monitor(host) < 0)
>  		goto out;
> +	req->a_args.state = nsm_local_state;

Hm.  It looks like a_args.state is never used, except in ifdef'd-out
code in nlm4svc_proc_lock() and nlmsvc_proc_lock() ifdef'd out.
Something's wrong there.  (Not your fault; but needs looking into.)

>  
>  	fl->fl_flags |= FL_ACCESS;
>  	status = do_vfs_lock(fl);
> diff --git a/fs/lockd/mon.c b/fs/lockd/mon.c
> index 6d5d4a4..5017d50 100644
> --- a/fs/lockd/mon.c
> +++ b/fs/lockd/mon.c
> @@ -188,8 +188,12 @@ int nsm_monitor(const struct nlm_host *host)
>  		status = -EIO;
>  	if (status < 0)
>  		printk(KERN_NOTICE "lockd: cannot monitor %s\n", nsm->sm_name);
> -	else
> +	else {
>  		nsm->sm_monitored = 1;
> +		nsm_local_state = res.state;
> +		dprintk("lockd: nsm_monitor: NSM state is now %d\n",
> +				nsm_local_state);

Could we make that a dprintk in the case where this changes nsm_local
state from something other than zero (nsm_lock_state && nsm_local_state
!= res.state)?

(Just to make sure no statd is returning inconsistent nsm_local_stats
here.)

> +	}
>  	return status;
>  }

--b.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-28 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-23 23:31 [PATCH 00/19] Proposed server-side patches for 2.6.31 Chuck Lever
     [not found] ` <20090423231550.17283.24432.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-23 23:31   ` [PATCH 01/19] SUNRPC: Fix error return value of svc_addr_len() Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <20090423233124.17283.40252.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-25 22:17       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-27 16:49         ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-27 23:51           ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-28 15:28             ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-28 15:31               ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-23 23:31   ` [PATCH 02/19] NFSD: Refactor transport removal out of __write_ports() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:31   ` [PATCH 03/19] NFSD: Refactor transport addition " Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:31   ` [PATCH 04/19] NFSD: Refactor portlist socket closing into a helper Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:31   ` [PATCH 05/19] NFSD: Refactor socket creation out of __write_ports() Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <20090423233155.17283.37345.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-25 22:40       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-23 23:32   ` [PATCH 06/19] NFSD: Note an additional requirement when passing TCP sockets to portlist Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:32   ` [PATCH 07/19] NFSD: Finish refactoring __write_ports() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:32   ` [PATCH 08/19] NFSD: move lockd_up() before svc_addsock() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:32   ` [PATCH 09/19] NFSD: Prevent a buffer overflow in svc_xprt_names() Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <20090423233225.17283.10176.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-27 23:56       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-23 23:32   ` [PATCH 10/19] SUNRPC: pass buffer size to svc_addsock() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:32   ` [PATCH 11/19] SUNRPC: pass buffer size to svc_sock_names() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:32   ` [PATCH 12/19] SUNRPC: Switch one_sock_name() to use snprintf() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:32   ` [PATCH 13/19] SUNRPC: Support PF_INET6 in one_sock_name() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:33   ` [PATCH 14/19] SUNRPC: Clean up one_sock_name() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:33   ` [PATCH 15/19] NFSD: Stricter buffer size checking in write_recoverydir() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:33   ` [PATCH 16/19] NFSD: Stricter buffer size checking in write_versions() Chuck Lever
2009-04-23 23:33   ` [PATCH 17/19] NFSD: Stricter buffer size checking in fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <20090423233325.17283.71127.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-28 16:31       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-28 16:36         ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-28 21:30           ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-23 23:33   ` [PATCH 18/19] lockd: Update NSM state from SM_MON replies Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <20090423233332.17283.23011.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-28 16:25       ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-04-28 16:34         ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-28 16:38           ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-28 19:11             ` Chuck Lever
2009-05-08 15:19               ` Chuck Lever
2009-05-08 15:33                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-23 23:33   ` [PATCH 19/19] lockd: clean up 64-bit alignment fix in nsm_init_private() Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <20090423233340.17283.29580.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-28 16:31       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-28 16:35         ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-28 16:40           ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-28 17:24             ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-28 21:36               ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-28 22:03                 ` Måns Rullgård
     [not found]                   ` <yw1x63gozb9f.fsf-O+uoZmgXk1l54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-28 22:14                     ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-28 22:11                 ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-28 22:23                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-28 22:31                   ` Måns Rullgård
     [not found]                     ` <yw1xws94xved.fsf-O+uoZmgXk1l54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-28 22:43                       ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-28 22:52                         ` Måns Rullgård
     [not found]                           ` <yw1xskjsxuff.fsf-O+uoZmgXk1l54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-29 15:16                             ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-29 18:02                               ` Måns Rullgård
2009-04-25 22:14   ` [PATCH 00/19] Proposed server-side patches for 2.6.31 J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090428162524.GI17891@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox