From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] NFSD: Stricter buffer size checking in fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:30:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20090428213057.GK23924@fieldses.org> References: <20090423231550.17283.24432.stgit@ingres.1015granger.net> <20090423233325.17283.71127.stgit@ingres.1015granger.net> <20090428163130.GL17891@fieldses.org> <933CF5D0-337D-46CF-81E8-13F617BF0B2F@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chuck Lever Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([141.211.133.115]:58212 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758810AbZD1Va5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:30:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <933CF5D0-337D-46CF-81E8-13F617BF0B2F@oracle.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:36:38PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > On Apr 28, 2009, at 12:31 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:33:25PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> Clean up: For consistency, handle output buffer size checking in a >>> other nfsctl functions the same way it's done for write_versions(). >> >> These all look fine to me, thanks. Let me know when you want them >> applied. > > Just to confirm that 1/19 looks OK to you too... I think you can apply 1 > - 17 now. OK, applied for 2.6.31. --b.