From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "David V. Cloud" <david.v.cloud@gmail.com>
Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfs4 write delegation status
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:38:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090722163810.GB4491@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe2cbb740907211447t4dfcc0dara63bb96648599638-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 05:47:17PM -0400, David V. Cloud wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was playing with nfs4 delegation, finding out that write delegations have
> never been granted. I am using Benny Halevy's git tree with latest
> pnfs-block-all branch. With rpcdebug, I found out that the write-delegation
> grant was rejected due to setlease failure with error code (-11, which is
> -EAGAIN). I finally figured out that this failure was caused by the
> following lines in generic_setlease function,
>
> if ((arg == F_WRLCK)
> && ((atomic_read(&dentry->d_count) > 1)
> || (atomic_read(&inode->i_count) > 1)))
> goto out;
>
> In my nfsd, the i_count, and d_count turn out to be 2 (no conflicts actaully
> exist in my test case), so write-delegations always failed. I did find some
> similar posts on nfs4 related mail lists about this problem. One possible
> hack by Ajay could be found at
> http://osdir.com/ml/linux.nfsv4/2006-08/msg00063.html
>
> I am curious whether there is any progress in awarding write delegation in
> current linux nfs4 implementation (for example, any git branch with write
> delegation enabled I can pull?) Or, is write-delegation feature available in
> other systems like OpenSolaris?
>
> Any suggestion if I would like to enable and test write delegation? I think
> some changes are needed to the setlease interface, right?
I really don't want to enable write delegations until we figure out how
to enforce them correctly against local (non-nfs) users of the exported
filesystem as well. In addition to breaking delegations on read opens,
that means breaking delegations or doing a cb_getattr on operations like
stat.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-22 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 21:47 nfs4 write delegation status David V. Cloud
[not found] ` <fe2cbb740907211447t4dfcc0dara63bb96648599638-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-22 16:38 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-07-23 8:12 ` Eric Veith
2009-07-23 13:00 ` J. Bruce Fields
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-23 15:10 Rick Macklem
2009-07-23 18:11 ` Andy Adamson
2009-07-24 18:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-07-24 19:32 ` David V. Cloud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090722163810.GB4491@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=david.v.cloud@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox