From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, pnfs@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [pnfs] [PATCH] nfsd41: renew_client must be called under the state lock
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:02:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090826210242.GB22723@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A94F060.4080209@panasas.com>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:20:48AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 08/26/2009 12:59 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > commit fdf7875040506ca7e595dffef56cbd81ae6b384b
> > Author: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
> > Date: Thu Aug 20 03:21:56 2009 +0300
> >
> > nfsd41: renew_client must be called under the state lock
> >
> > Until we work out the state locking so we can use a spin lock to protect
> > the cl_lru, we need to take the state_lock to renew the client.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
> > [nfsd41: Do not renew state on error]
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index d2a0524..8e5ac49 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -1463,12 +1463,16 @@ nfsd4_sequence(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> > spin_lock(&sessionid_lock);
> > status = nfserr_badsession;
> > session = find_in_sessionid_hashtbl(&seq->sessionid);
> > - if (!session)
> > - goto out;
> > + if (!session) {
> > + spin_unlock(&sessionid_lock);
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> >
> > status = nfserr_badslot;
> > - if (seq->slotid >= session->se_fchannel.maxreqs)
> > - goto out;
> > + if (seq->slotid >= session->se_fchannel.maxreqs) {
> > + spin_unlock(&sessionid_lock);
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> >
>
> A spin_unlock is a big and delicate inlined code site
> Why not do a "goto err_unlock" or something
Yes, we could add an
err_unlock:
spin_unlock(&sessionid_lock);
goto err;
at the end. It still seems little delicate.
How about the following (on top of Benny's patch), which sends all the
unlock cases to one label? (Disclaimer: untested. And this depends on
the assumption that cstate->session is NULL on entry to this function,
which I haven't checked.)
--b.
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 8e5ac49..5f634d2 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -1463,16 +1463,12 @@ nfsd4_sequence(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
spin_lock(&sessionid_lock);
status = nfserr_badsession;
session = find_in_sessionid_hashtbl(&seq->sessionid);
- if (!session) {
- spin_unlock(&sessionid_lock);
- goto err;
- }
+ if (!session)
+ goto out;
status = nfserr_badslot;
- if (seq->slotid >= session->se_fchannel.maxreqs) {
- spin_unlock(&sessionid_lock);
- goto err;
- }
+ if (seq->slotid >= session->se_fchannel.maxreqs)
+ goto out;
slot = &session->se_slots[seq->slotid];
dprintk("%s: slotid %d\n", __func__, seq->slotid);
@@ -1487,10 +1483,8 @@ nfsd4_sequence(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
cstate->status = nfserr_replay_cache;
goto out;
}
- if (status) {
- spin_unlock(&sessionid_lock);
- goto err;
- }
+ if (status)
+ goto out;
/* Success! bump slot seqid */
slot->sl_inuse = true;
@@ -1510,10 +1504,11 @@ nfsd4_sequence(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
out:
spin_unlock(&sessionid_lock);
/* Renew the clientid on success and on replay */
- nfs4_lock_state();
- renew_client(session->se_client);
- nfs4_unlock_state();
-err:
+ if (cstate->session) {
+ nfs4_lock_state();
+ renew_client(session->se_client);
+ nfs4_unlock_state();
+ }
dprintk("%s: return %d\n", __func__, ntohl(status));
return status;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 0:21 [PATCH] nfsd41: renew_client must be called under the state lock Benny Halevy
2009-08-24 16:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-25 7:06 ` Benny Halevy
2009-08-25 13:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-25 17:02 ` Benny Halevy
2009-08-25 21:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-26 8:20 ` [pnfs] " Boaz Harrosh
2009-08-26 21:02 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-08-27 16:37 ` Benny Halevy
2009-08-27 21:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-27 21:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090826210242.GB22723@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pnfs@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox