From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Shehjar Tikoo <shehjart-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux client mount fails with Gluster NFSv3 server
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:43:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901164334.GL22846@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251807998.18608.1.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 08:26:37AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 12:09 +0530, Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
> > I am able to view the packets just fine using wireshark Version 1.0.6.
> > It is possible that the default options for you for TCP and RPC are
> > not same as the ones below.
> > Could you please try viewing the dump with the following options set
> > in the wireshark Protocol preferences pane.
> >
> > Press <Ctrl> + <Shift> + p to bring up the protocol preferences
> > window.
> >
> > First, expand the "Protocol" section header in the window that pops
> > up. Then look for "TCP" section. In the TCP section, please check the
> > following option:
> >
> > "Allow subdissector to reassemble TCP streams"
> >
> > Then, search for the "RPC" section under "Protocols". For RPC, please
> > check the following option:
> >
> > "Reassemble RPC over TCP message spanning multiple TCP segments"
> >
> > This should make the RPC records visible properly.
>
> I always run with those options enabled, and they were able to
> reconstruct most of the RPC records correctly, but not the reply to the
> FSINFO call.
Same here--both options set, and I don't normally have this problem.
The segments look OK, though (the sequence numbers are what you'd
expect, anyway)--if the xdr was screwed up you'd think wireshark would
still attempt to parse it. I'm using 1.0.7 (from 1.0.7-1ubuntu1), but
too lazy to try to debug wireshark....
--b.
> Furthermore, when I looked at the binary contents, it seemed to me that
> the post-op attributes contained some fishy information, such as
> nlink==0. That alone would cause the NFS client to give up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 14:07 Linux client mount fails with Gluster NFSv3 server Shehjar Tikoo
[not found] ` <4A9BD90B.4090804-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 17:12 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251738771.5144.21.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-01 6:39 ` Shehjar Tikoo
[not found] ` <4A9CC186.10504-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-01 12:26 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251807998.18608.1.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-01 13:13 ` Shehjar Tikoo
2009-09-01 16:43 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-08-31 19:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090901164334.GL22846@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shehjart-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox