public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@netapp.com,
	nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, sfrench@us.ibm.com, agruen@suse.de
Subject: Re: POSIX ACL support for NFSV4 (using sideband protocol)
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:42:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090902164243.GA17126@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251894268-1555-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:54:20PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This patch series implement POSIX ACL support for NFSV4 clients
> using sideband protocol.

What motivates this?  Who exactly wants this and why?   What would be
the advantages compared to other options, such as:

	- native v4 support in filesystems, or
	- improved client-side acl tools that provided a user interface
	  for v4 acls closer to that for v3 acls, or
	- a v4.x extension to add support to the main protocol?

Is there interest in implementing this on any OS other than linux, or
would this be a linux-only extension for the forseeable future?

What sideband protocol exactly?  If it's exactly the same protocol as
the one used with v3, there must be some slight mismatches: e.g. v4
filehandles are allowed to be longer.  How do you deal with these?

--b.

> The ACL support can be disabled/enabled
> using -o noacl/-o acl mount option. The feature enables to
> view and  modify POSIX acls from NFSv4 client.
_______________________________________________
NFSv4 mailing list
NFSv4@linux-nfs.org
http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-02 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-02 12:24 POSIX ACL support for NFSV4 (using sideband protocol) Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] nfs4: Posix acl server side side-band protocol support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] nfsv4: Switch to generic xattr handling code Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] nfsv4: Add support for posix ACL Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] nfs: use different capability flag for v4 and posix acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] nfsv4: Add nfsv4 rpc client side support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] nfsv4: Implement posix listxattr Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] nfsv4: Implement getfacl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] nfsv4: Implement setfacl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 16:42 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-09-02 17:49   ` POSIX ACL support for NFSV4 (using sideband protocol) Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-02 18:27     ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-03 19:09   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-02 18:56 Steve French
2009-09-02 20:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-02 20:53   ` Steve French
2009-09-03  6:20     ` Ondrej Valousek
2009-09-03  7:46       ` Muntz, Daniel
2009-09-03 10:41         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-03 13:36         ` Steve French
2009-09-03 13:54           ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-03 13:57             ` Steve French
2009-09-03 15:01         ` David P. Quigley
2009-09-03 13:54       ` Steve French
2009-09-03 13:55         ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-03 15:35           ` Steve French
     [not found]             ` <524f69650909030835s41e78436p4b67594cf91de639-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-03 16:08               ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-03 14:09         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-03 18:55           ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2009-09-03 14:16     ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-03 15:14       ` Steve French
2009-10-05 16:31   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2009-10-05 16:44     ` Steve French
2009-10-05 17:09       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2009-10-05 17:19         ` Steve French
2009-09-02 19:06 Steve French

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090902164243.GA17126@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox