From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: [PATCH 2/9] sunrpc/cache: simplify cache_fresh_locked and cache_fresh_unlocked. Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:32:54 +1000 Message-ID: <20090909063254.20462.36051.stgit@notabene.brown> References: <20090909062539.20462.67466.stgit@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56294 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751514AbZIIGcq (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 02:32:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090909062539.20462.67466.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: The extra call to cache_revisit_request in cache_fresh_unlocked is not needed, as should have been fairly clear at the time of commit 4013edea9a0b6cdcb1fdf5d4011e47e068fd6efb If there are requests to be revisited, then we can be sure that CACHE_PENDING is set, so the second call is sufficient. So remove the first call. Then remove the 'new' parameter, then remove the return value for cache_fresh_locked which is only used to provide the value for 'new'. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown --- net/sunrpc/cache.c | 23 ++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c index aafb0e7..baddb23 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c @@ -105,18 +105,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_lookup); static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch); -static int cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry) +static void cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry) { head->expiry_time = expiry; head->last_refresh = get_seconds(); - return !test_and_set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags); + set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags); } static void cache_fresh_unlocked(struct cache_head *head, - struct cache_detail *detail, int new) + struct cache_detail *detail) { - if (new) - cache_revisit_request(head); if (test_and_clear_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &head->flags)) { cache_revisit_request(head); cache_dequeue(detail, head); @@ -132,7 +130,6 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail, */ struct cache_head **head; struct cache_head *tmp; - int is_new; if (!test_bit(CACHE_VALID, &old->flags)) { write_lock(&detail->hash_lock); @@ -141,9 +138,9 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail, set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &old->flags); else detail->update(old, new); - is_new = cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time); + cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time); write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock); - cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, is_new); + cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail); return old; } write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock); @@ -167,11 +164,11 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail, *head = tmp; detail->entries++; cache_get(tmp); - is_new = cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time); + cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time); cache_fresh_locked(old, 0); write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock); - cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail, is_new); - cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, 0); + cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail); + cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail); cache_put(old, detail); return tmp; } @@ -240,8 +237,8 @@ int cache_check(struct cache_detail *detail, cache_revisit_request(h); if (rv == -EAGAIN) { set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &h->flags); - cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail, - cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY)); + cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY); + cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail); rv = -ENOENT; } break;