From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Alexandros Batsakis <batsakis@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] nfs41: adjust max_rqst_sz, max_resp_sz w.r.t to rsize, wsize
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:39:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124203923.GA29856@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B0C2FA2.8000207@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:10:26PM -0500, Peter Staubach wrote:
> Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone ever going to use NFSv4.1 over UDP?
> >
>
> I thought that NFSv4 over UDP was outlawed because UDP, as
> a transport, did not offer the correct set of semantics
> required. I know that the Linux NFSv4 server registers
> NFSv4 over UDP, but I don't know of any other servers which
> do.
>
> I was going to file a bug and a patch to stop NFSv4 from
> being transported over UDP. :-)
OK by me.--b.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-24 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 21:54 [PATCH 01/10] nfs41: adjust max_rqst_sz, max_resp_sz w.r.t to rsize, wsize Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] nfs41: add support for callback with RPC version number 4 Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] nfs41: fix cb_recall bug Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] nfs4: minor delegation cleaning Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfs4: return/expire delegations depending on their type Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] nfs41: initial support for CB_RECALL_ANY Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] nfs41: check if session exists and if it is persistent Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] nfs41: add support for the exclusive create flags Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] nfs41: remove server-only EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R flag from exchange_id Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 21:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] nfs41: check SEQUENCE status flag Alexandros Batsakis
2009-11-23 23:07 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfs4: return/expire delegations depending on their type Trond Myklebust
2009-11-23 23:16 ` [PATCH 03/10] nfs41: fix cb_recall bug Trond Myklebust
2009-11-23 22:06 ` [PATCH 01/10] nfs41: adjust max_rqst_sz, max_resp_sz w.r.t to rsize, wsize Peter Staubach
2009-11-23 22:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-11-23 23:14 ` Batsakis, Alexandros
2009-11-24 19:10 ` Peter Staubach
2009-11-24 20:39 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091124203923.GA29856@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=batsakis@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox