From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] VM/NFS: The VM must tell the filesystem when to free reclaimable pages Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:37:35 +0800 Message-ID: <20100107143735.GA20300@localhost> References: <20100106205110.22547.85345.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100106205110.22547.81645.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100107022903.GD9475@localhost> <1262839763.2185.25.camel@localhost> <20100107050307.GA19399@localhost> <1262842243.2185.47.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Jan Kara , Steve Rago , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "jens.axboe" , Peter Staubach , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:1504 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752449Ab0AGOh7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:37:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1262842243.2185.47.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:30:43PM +0800, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:03 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > "commit" could also be misread as "commit a transaction"? > > Anyway I think adding an "nfs" limits the scope to NFS thus makes code > > reading somehow easier. Just a personal feeling. > > How about 'force_commit_unstable' instead? That ties it up to the > unstable writes rather than NFS. That would be good, thanks! Fengguang