public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bpm@sgi.com
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sunrpc: socket buffer size module parameter
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:12:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100223161224.GG10942@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B833056.8020703@oracle.com>

Hey Chuck,

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:33:10PM -0800, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 02/22/2010 01:54 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
>> +int            tcp_rcvbuf_nrpc = 6;
>
> Just curious, is this '6' a typo?

Not a typo.  The original setting for tcp receive buffer was hardcoded
at

3 (in svc_tcp_init and svc_tcp_recv_record)
	*
sv_max_mesg
	*
2 (in svc_sock_setbufsize)
	
That's where I came up with the 6 for the tcp recv buffer.  The setting
hasn't changed.



The UDP send/recv buffer settings and TCP send buffer settings were
going to be

( 4 (default number of kernel threads on sles11)
	+
3 (as in svc_udp_recvfrom, etc) )
	*
sv_max_mesg
	* 
2 (in svc_sock_setbufsize)

but 14 wasn't a very round number, so I went with 16 which also happened
to match the slot_table_entries default.

> Perhaps it would be nice to have a  
> single macro defined as the default value for all of these.
>
> Do we have a high degree of confidence that these new default settings  
> will not adversely affect workloads that already perform well?

This patch has been in several releases of SGI's nfsd respin and I've
heard nothing to suggest there is an issue.  I didn't spend much time
taking measurements on UDP and didn't keep my TCP measurements.  If you
feel measurements are essential I'll be happy to provide a few, but
won't be able to get around to it for a little while.

Thanks,
	Ben

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-23 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-22 21:54 [PATCH 0/2] knfsd: support larger numbers of clients Ben Myers
2010-02-22 21:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] knfsd: nfsd_max_connections module parameter Ben Myers
2010-02-22 21:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] sunrpc: socket buffer size " Ben Myers
2010-02-23  1:33   ` Chuck Lever
2010-02-23 16:12     ` bpm [this message]
2010-02-23 20:09       ` Chuck Lever
2010-02-23 20:48         ` bpm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100223161224.GG10942@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox