From: wsnyder-12vJDDTx9R9AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org (Wilson Snyder)
To: bpm@sgi.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with nfs server reboot causing exports to jumble
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:33:36 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100225203336.9F69118839E@wsnyder.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100225200657.GD20620@sgi.com
>Wilson,
>
>On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:29:10PM -0500, Wilson Snyder wrote:
>>
>> We're using the 2.6.18 x86_64 kernel (RH SL 5.1) with a NFS
>> v3 server and NFS v3 clients using the automounter with options
>> (rw,noatime,hard,intr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,proto=tcp).
>>
>> Our NFS server had several exports
>>
>> /export/a/{files-a}
>> /export/b/{files-b}
>>
>> these were mounted on various clients.
>>
>> We then added a new mount and export without rebooting:
>>
>> /export/a/{files-a}
>> /export/b/{files-b}
>> /export/c/{files-c}
>>
>> All were visible on the clients, and everything was fine:
>>
>> /nfs/a/{files-a}
>> /nfs/b/{files-b}
>> /nfs/c/{files-c}
>>
>> Our NFS server then crashed, and rebooted. After reboot the
>> clients then had:
>>
>> /nfs/a/{files-c}
>> /nfs/b/{files-a}
>> /nfs/c/{files-b}
>>
>> Note the files correspond to the wrong exports. Remounting
>> on every client fixed the problem - once we realized what
>> was going on! (files-a/b/c were all similar so it wasn't
>> immediately aparent)
>>
>> My speculation is the reboot changed some enumeration
>> causing a mismatch between the clients and servers.
>>
>> This is a new one by me - is this a known issue, and if so
>> is a patch available?
>>
>> Other than patching, are there any precautions we can take
>> to avoid this in the future? (Other than not crashing the
>> server, which we'd be happy to not to do. :)
>
>Use the mp and fsid export options documented in the exports manpage.
Reading between the lines, are you suggesting the mounts
weren't ready when the exports started (or from the
pre-reboot's mount), causing the fsid's to be identical? I
could see that happening.
I presume then that it's enough to just use mp - assuming
each mountpoint has a unique UUID? Wouldn't adding fsid now
(with the server and clients all up) require me to remount
every client?
Finally, is there a way to examine the present
(automatically assigned) fsid's so I can confirm this was
the problem?
Thanks much
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-25 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-25 19:29 Problem with nfs server reboot causing exports to jumble Wilson Snyder
[not found] ` <20100225192911.09CC318839E-12vJDDTx9R9AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-25 20:06 ` bpm
2010-02-25 20:33 ` Wilson Snyder [this message]
[not found] ` <20100225203336.9F69118839E-12vJDDTx9R9AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-26 16:38 ` bpm
2010-02-27 21:10 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100225203336.9F69118839E@wsnyder.org \
--to=wsnyder-12vjddtx9r9afugrpc6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox