From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: The recent kref_put warning (was: [PATCH] sunrpc: remove unnecessary svc_xprt_put)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:07:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100228220723.GB27965@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100228210553.GA27965@fieldses.org>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 04:05:53PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 04:59:13PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> > I've made quite a few changes here - it might be worth splitting them
> > up.
>
> Probably so.
So, if I first revert b292cf9 and then b0401d7, I get the following.
I don't understand the "return 0" in the XPT_CLOSE case. Is it really
OK for the caller to try to process this request?
--b.
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index 8f0f1fb..48f91fb 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -706,9 +706,11 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
len = 0;
+
if (test_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
dprintk("svc_recv: found XPT_CLOSE\n");
svc_delete_xprt(xprt);
+ return 0;
} else if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
struct svc_xprt *newxpt;
newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt);
@@ -735,19 +737,20 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
svc_xprt_received(newxpt);
}
svc_xprt_received(xprt);
- } else {
- dprintk("svc: server %p, pool %u, transport %p, inuse=%d\n",
- rqstp, pool->sp_id, xprt,
- atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount));
- rqstp->rq_deferred = svc_deferred_dequeue(xprt);
- if (rqstp->rq_deferred) {
- svc_xprt_received(xprt);
- len = svc_deferred_recv(rqstp);
- } else
- len = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_recvfrom(rqstp);
- dprintk("svc: got len=%d\n", len);
+ return 0;
}
+ dprintk("svc: server %p, pool %u, transport %p, inuse=%d\n",
+ rqstp, pool->sp_id, xprt,
+ atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount));
+ rqstp->rq_deferred = svc_deferred_dequeue(xprt);
+ if (rqstp->rq_deferred)
+ len = svc_deferred_recv(rqstp);
+ else
+ len = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_recvfrom(rqstp);
+ dprintk("svc: got len=%d\n", len);
+ svc_xprt_received(xprt);
+
/* No data, incomplete (TCP) read, or accept() */
if (len == 0 || len == -EAGAIN) {
rqstp->rq_res.len = 0;
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 9e09391..cc68137 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ static int svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
dprintk("svc: recvfrom returned error %d\n", -err);
set_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
}
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
return -EAGAIN;
}
len = svc_addr_len(svc_addr(rqstp));
@@ -562,11 +561,6 @@ static int svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
svsk->sk_sk->sk_stamp = skb->tstamp;
set_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags); /* there may be more data... */
- /*
- * Maybe more packets - kick another thread ASAP.
- */
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
-
len = skb->len - sizeof(struct udphdr);
rqstp->rq_arg.len = len;
@@ -917,7 +911,6 @@ static int svc_tcp_recv_record(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
if (len < want) {
dprintk("svc: short recvfrom while reading record "
"length (%d of %d)\n", len, want);
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
goto err_again; /* record header not complete */
}
@@ -953,7 +946,6 @@ static int svc_tcp_recv_record(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
if (len < svsk->sk_reclen) {
dprintk("svc: incomplete TCP record (%d of %d)\n",
len, svsk->sk_reclen);
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
goto err_again; /* record not complete */
}
len = svsk->sk_reclen;
@@ -961,10 +953,9 @@ static int svc_tcp_recv_record(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
return len;
error:
- if (len == -EAGAIN) {
+ if (len == -EAGAIN)
dprintk("RPC: TCP recv_record got EAGAIN\n");
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
- }
+
return len;
err_delete:
set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
@@ -1109,18 +1100,14 @@ out:
svsk->sk_tcplen = 0;
svc_xprt_copy_addrs(rqstp, &svsk->sk_xprt);
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
if (serv->sv_stats)
serv->sv_stats->nettcpcnt++;
return len;
err_again:
- if (len == -EAGAIN) {
+ if (len == -EAGAIN)
dprintk("RPC: TCP recvfrom got EAGAIN\n");
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
- return len;
- }
error:
if (len != -EAGAIN) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: recvfrom returned errno %d\n",
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
index f92e37e..0194de8 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
@@ -566,7 +566,6 @@ static int rdma_read_complete(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
ret, rqstp->rq_arg.len, rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_base,
rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len);
- svc_xprt_received(rqstp->rq_xprt);
return ret;
}
@@ -665,7 +664,6 @@ int svc_rdma_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len);
rqstp->rq_prot = IPPROTO_MAX;
svc_xprt_copy_addrs(rqstp, xprt);
- svc_xprt_received(xprt);
return ret;
close_out:
@@ -678,6 +676,5 @@ int svc_rdma_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
*/
set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags);
defer:
- svc_xprt_received(xprt);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-28 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-26 22:33 [PATCH] sunrpc: remove unnecessary svc_xprt_put Neil Brown
[not found] ` <19336.19524.469529.431210-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-26 22:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-26 22:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-27 0:40 ` Tom Tucker
2010-02-27 1:35 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <20100227123537.6289e326-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-27 2:38 ` Tom Tucker
2010-03-01 4:23 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <20100301152310.750f3504-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-01 14:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-27 5:59 ` The recent kref_put warning (was: [PATCH] sunrpc: remove unnecessary svc_xprt_put) Neil Brown
[not found] ` <20100227165913.53718449-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-28 0:46 ` The recent kref_put warning Tom Tucker
2010-02-28 21:05 ` The recent kref_put warning (was: [PATCH] sunrpc: remove unnecessary svc_xprt_put) J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-28 22:07 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-02-28 23:57 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <20100301105734.7fe935b0-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-01 3:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-03-01 3:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-03-01 5:51 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <20100301165114.74d2797b-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-01 14:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-03-01 23:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-03-01 23:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-28 21:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100228220723.GB27965@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox