public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: Fix svc_tcp_recvfrom()
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:00:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100402210000.GL5433@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100318212153.GB23085@fieldses.org>

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:21:53PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:47:56PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > Ensure that we immediately read and buffer data from the incoming TCP
> > stream so that we grow the receive window quickly, and don't deadlock on
> > large READ or WRITE requests.
> 
> So, I dropped this patch earlier because although I don't have a serious
> problem with it, I also couldn't explain why exactly it would explain
> the performance differences we were seeing, and I was afraid we might be
> papering over some other (as yet unfound) problem--so it seemed safest
> just to revert the original buffer changes for the time being and leave
> this alone.
> 
> However: I'm recently reminded of a different problem, which is this:
> 
> 	if (!(svsk->sk_reclen & RPC_LAST_STREAM_FRAGMENT)) {
> 		/* FIXME: technically, a record can be fragmented, and
> 		 * non-terminal fragments will not have the top bit set
> 		 * in the fragment length header.  But apparently no
> 		 * known nfs clients send fragmented records.  */
> 		if (net_ratelimit())
> 			printk(KERN_NOTICE "RPC: multiple fragments "
> 				"per record not supported\n");
> 		goto err_delete;
> 	}
> 
> (Reminded because libtirpc does in fact send these fragmented records
> (why, I have no idea), so the CITI windows client (which uses libtirpc)
> hits this case.  Hah.  In any case, this is a server bug, and we really
> should fix it.)
> 
> The current server behavior is to leave the data in the network buffers
> until it's sure it has a full request.  It seems hard to do that if the
> server has to go dig through the network buffers to find all the record
> markers.  (Is there even a reasonable way to do that?)
> 
> So I wonder whether I should rebase this to the most recent kernel and
> then try implementing the rpc stream fragment handling on top.

I think you said you had a copy of this patch that you've already
updated?

--b.

> 
> --b.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h |    1 
> >  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c           |  167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> > index 483e103..b0b4546 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct svc_sock {
> >  	/* private TCP part */
> >  	u32			sk_reclen;	/* length of record */
> >  	u32			sk_tcplen;	/* current read length */
> > +	struct page *		sk_pages[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES];	/* received data */
> >  };
> >  
> >  /*
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > index eed978e..7dd65b0 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > @@ -323,6 +323,33 @@ static int svc_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct kvec *iov, int nr,
> >  	return len;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int svc_partial_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> > +				struct kvec *iov, int nr,
> > +				int buflen, unsigned int base)
> > +{
> > +	size_t save_iovlen;
> > +	void __user *save_iovbase;
> > +	unsigned int i;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (base == 0)
> > +		return svc_recvfrom(rqstp, iov, nr, buflen);
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> > +		if (iov[i].iov_len > base)
> > +			break;
> > +		base -= iov[i].iov_len;
> > +	}
> > +	save_iovlen = iov[i].iov_len;
> > +	save_iovbase = iov[i].iov_base;
> > +	iov[i].iov_len -= base;
> > +	iov[i].iov_base += base;
> > +	ret = svc_recvfrom(rqstp, &iov[i], nr - i, buflen);
> > +	iov[i].iov_len = save_iovlen;
> > +	iov[i].iov_base = save_iovbase;
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Set socket snd and rcv buffer lengths
> >   */
> > @@ -790,6 +817,56 @@ failed:
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static unsigned int svc_tcp_restore_pages(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i, len, npages;
> > +
> > +	if (svsk->sk_tcplen <= sizeof(rpc_fraghdr))
> > +		return 0;
> > +	len = svsk->sk_tcplen - sizeof(rpc_fraghdr);
> > +	npages = (len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +	for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> > +		if (rqstp->rq_pages[i] != NULL)
> > +			put_page(rqstp->rq_pages[i]);
> > +		BUG_ON(svsk->sk_pages[i] == NULL);
> > +		rqstp->rq_pages[i] = svsk->sk_pages[i];
> > +		svsk->sk_pages[i] = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +	rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_base = page_address(rqstp->rq_pages[0]);
> > +	return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void svc_tcp_save_pages(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i, len, npages;
> > +
> > +	if (svsk->sk_tcplen <= sizeof(rpc_fraghdr))
> > +		return;
> > +	len = svsk->sk_tcplen - sizeof(rpc_fraghdr);
> > +	npages = (len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +	for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> > +		svsk->sk_pages[i] = rqstp->rq_pages[i];
> > +		rqstp->rq_pages[i] = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void svc_tcp_clear_pages(struct svc_sock *svsk)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i, len, npages;
> > +
> > +	if (svsk->sk_tcplen <= sizeof(rpc_fraghdr))
> > +		goto out;
> > +	len = svsk->sk_tcplen - sizeof(rpc_fraghdr);
> > +	npages = (len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +	for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> > +		BUG_ON(svsk->sk_pages[i] == NULL);
> > +		put_page(svsk->sk_pages[i]);
> > +		svsk->sk_pages[i] = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +out:
> > +	svsk->sk_tcplen = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Receive data from a TCP socket.
> >   */
> > @@ -800,7 +877,8 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >  	struct svc_serv	*serv = svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_server;
> >  	int		len;
> >  	struct kvec *vec;
> > -	int pnum, vlen;
> > +	unsigned int want, base, vlen;
> > +	int pnum;
> >  
> >  	dprintk("svc: tcp_recv %p data %d conn %d close %d\n",
> >  		svsk, test_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags),
> > @@ -814,9 +892,9 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >  	 * possible up to the complete record length.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (svsk->sk_tcplen < sizeof(rpc_fraghdr)) {
> > -		int		want = sizeof(rpc_fraghdr) - svsk->sk_tcplen;
> >  		struct kvec	iov;
> >  
> > +		want = sizeof(rpc_fraghdr) - svsk->sk_tcplen;
> >  		iov.iov_base = ((char *) &svsk->sk_reclen) + svsk->sk_tcplen;
> >  		iov.iov_len  = want;
> >  		if ((len = svc_recvfrom(rqstp, &iov, 1, want)) < 0)
> > @@ -826,8 +904,7 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >  		if (len < want) {
> >  			dprintk("svc: short recvfrom while reading record "
> >  				"length (%d of %d)\n", len, want);
> > -			svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> > -			return -EAGAIN; /* record header not complete */
> > +			goto err_noclose;
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		svsk->sk_reclen = ntohl(svsk->sk_reclen);
> > @@ -853,25 +930,14 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	/* Check whether enough data is available */
> > -	len = svc_recv_available(svsk);
> > -	if (len < 0)
> > -		goto error;
> > -
> > -	if (len < svsk->sk_reclen) {
> > -		dprintk("svc: incomplete TCP record (%d of %d)\n",
> > -			len, svsk->sk_reclen);
> > -		svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> > -		return -EAGAIN;	/* record not complete */
> > -	}
> > -	len = svsk->sk_reclen;
> > -	set_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > +	base = svc_tcp_restore_pages(svsk, rqstp);
> > +	want = svsk->sk_reclen - base;
> >  
> >  	vec = rqstp->rq_vec;
> >  	vec[0] = rqstp->rq_arg.head[0];
> >  	vlen = PAGE_SIZE;
> >  	pnum = 1;
> > -	while (vlen < len) {
> > +	while (vlen < svsk->sk_reclen) {
> >  		vec[pnum].iov_base = page_address(rqstp->rq_pages[pnum]);
> >  		vec[pnum].iov_len = PAGE_SIZE;
> >  		pnum++;
> > @@ -880,19 +946,26 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >  	rqstp->rq_respages = &rqstp->rq_pages[pnum];
> >  
> >  	/* Now receive data */
> > -	len = svc_recvfrom(rqstp, vec, pnum, len);
> > -	if (len < 0)
> > -		goto error;
> > +	clear_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > +	len = svc_partial_recvfrom(rqstp, vec, pnum, want, base);
> > +	if (len != want) {
> > +		if (len >= 0)
> > +			svsk->sk_tcplen += len;
> > +		else if (len != -EAGAIN)
> > +			goto err_other;
> > +		svc_tcp_save_pages(svsk, rqstp);
> > +		dprintk("svc: incomplete TCP record (%d of %d)\n",
> > +			svsk->sk_tcplen, svsk->sk_reclen);
> > +		goto err_noclose;
> > +	}
> >  
> > -	dprintk("svc: TCP complete record (%d bytes)\n", len);
> > -	rqstp->rq_arg.len = len;
> > +	rqstp->rq_arg.len = svsk->sk_reclen;
> >  	rqstp->rq_arg.page_base = 0;
> > -	if (len <= rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len) {
> > -		rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len = len;
> > +	if (rqstp->rq_arg.len <= rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len) {
> > +		rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len = rqstp->rq_arg.len;
> >  		rqstp->rq_arg.page_len = 0;
> > -	} else {
> > -		rqstp->rq_arg.page_len = len - rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len;
> > -	}
> > +	} else
> > +		rqstp->rq_arg.page_len = rqstp->rq_arg.len - rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len;
> >  
> >  	rqstp->rq_xprt_ctxt   = NULL;
> >  	rqstp->rq_prot	      = IPPROTO_TCP;
> > @@ -900,29 +973,32 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >  	/* Reset TCP read info */
> >  	svsk->sk_reclen = 0;
> >  	svsk->sk_tcplen = 0;
> > +	/* If we have more data, signal svc_xprt_enqueue() to try again */
> > +	if (svc_recv_available(svsk) > sizeof(rpc_fraghdr))
> > +		set_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > +
> >  
> >  	svc_xprt_copy_addrs(rqstp, &svsk->sk_xprt);
> >  	svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> >  	if (serv->sv_stats)
> >  		serv->sv_stats->nettcpcnt++;
> >  
> > -	return len;
> > -
> > - err_delete:
> > +	dprintk("svc: TCP complete record (%d bytes)\n", rqstp->rq_arg.len);
> > +	return rqstp->rq_arg.len;
> > +error:
> > +	if (len == -EAGAIN)
> > +		goto err_got_eagain;
> > +err_other:
> > +	printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: recvfrom returned errno %d\n",
> > +	       svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_server->sv_name, -len);
> > +err_delete:
> >  	set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> >  	return -EAGAIN;
> > -
> > - error:
> > -	if (len == -EAGAIN) {
> > -		dprintk("RPC: TCP recvfrom got EAGAIN\n");
> > -		svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> > -	} else {
> > -		printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: recvfrom returned errno %d\n",
> > -		       svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_server->sv_name, -len);
> > -		goto err_delete;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	return len;
> > +err_got_eagain:
> > +	dprintk("RPC: TCP recvfrom got EAGAIN\n");
> > +err_noclose:
> > +	svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> > +	return -EAGAIN;	/* record not complete */
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -1042,6 +1118,7 @@ static void svc_tcp_init(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_serv *serv)
> >  
> >  		svsk->sk_reclen = 0;
> >  		svsk->sk_tcplen = 0;
> > +		memset(&svsk->sk_pages[0], 0, sizeof(svsk->sk_pages));
> >  
> >  		tcp_sk(sk)->nonagle |= TCP_NAGLE_OFF;
> >  
> > @@ -1290,8 +1367,10 @@ static void svc_tcp_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> >  
> >  	svc_sock_detach(xprt);
> >  
> > -	if (!test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags))
> > +	if (!test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
> > +		svc_tcp_clear_pages(svsk);
> >  		kernel_sock_shutdown(svsk->sk_sock, SHUT_RDWR);
> > +	}
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> _______________________________________________
> NFSv4 mailing list
> NFSv4@linux-nfs.org
> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-02 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-18 21:47 [PATCH 0/3] Fix the Linux rpc-over-tcp server performance Trond Myklebust
     [not found] ` <20090518214756.786.28129.stgit-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-18 21:47   ` [PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: Fix the TCP write space reservations for deferred requests Trond Myklebust
     [not found]     ` <20090518214756.786.33956.stgit-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-19 22:23       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-06-20 21:44         ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]           ` <1245534248.5182.45.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-24 21:32             ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-18 21:47   ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Fix the TCP server's send buffer accounting Trond Myklebust
     [not found]     ` <20090518214756.786.58191.stgit-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-19  3:06       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-18 21:47   ` [PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: Fix svc_tcp_recvfrom() Trond Myklebust
2010-03-18 21:21     ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-02 21:00       ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-05-19 15:14   ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix the Linux rpc-over-tcp server performance Jeff Moyer
2009-08-12  2:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-12 13:22   ` Jeff Moyer
2009-08-12 14:20     ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-12 17:02       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-08-12 22:32         ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-12 22:40           ` Trond Myklebust
2009-08-13 13:05           ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100402210000.GL5433@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox