From: Thomas Wunder <thomas.wunder@swt-bamberg.de>
To: Kevin Coffman <kwc@citi.umich.edu>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS-Mount with MIT-Kerberos5 doesn't use user tickets...
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:15:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004091115.27725.thomas.wunder@swt-bamberg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q2z4d569c331004081158v447450e7sc962c1e3e84de0d@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 08 April 2010 20:58:49 you wrote:
> Sorry, I missed that, or forgot. And you still get "mount : only root
> can mount ..." if you do "mount /mnt/net" as tomkrb ?? If so, that
> seems like a bug.
No, with that entry each user is able to invoke mount. The problem is that
mount is carried out with uid=0 then.
> Yes, because under sudo, you are running as root.
obviously...
I'm wondering if there's a chance to run mount with a non-root uid at all. On
the other hand is that really needed? I mean I just want it to pass the
calling user's uid to the rpc.gssd...
By the way the rpcsec_gss_krb5 is loaded.
> You said you had this working for the case where root did the mount
> using a keytab though, correct? It can also be caused by a mismatch
> of sec flavors. (i.e., is the server exporting with krb5p?)
Yes, it worked fine when i used a keytab-file with the key for the client-
machine-principal in it. When i issued mount everything worked fine. The
problem with this kind of setup is just that this would simply be some kind of
host-based authentication and I can't trust the people which will use the
clients as much to use a keytab file. They could simply boot from a LiveCD,
memstick etc. and steal that keytab file...
I've double checked that krb5p is specified in the server's /etc/exports as
well as in the client's /etc/fstab (i've also tried it with "krb5" on both
sides but that didn't make any difference) .
Does it matter whether those two flags match before the security context is
completely established at all?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-07 14:37 NFS-Mount with MIT-Kerberos5 doesn't use user tickets Tom
2010-04-07 15:29 ` Kevin Coffman
2010-04-07 23:11 ` thomas.wunder
2010-04-08 14:18 ` Kevin Coffman
2010-04-08 15:39 ` Thomas Wunder
2010-04-08 18:58 ` Kevin Coffman
2010-04-09 9:15 ` Thomas Wunder [this message]
2010-04-09 14:50 ` Kevin Coffman
[not found] ` <y2o4d569c331004090750zeb56bf58udb7bbfb3277832c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-09 15:00 ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2010-04-09 16:37 ` Chuck Lever
2010-04-10 16:13 ` Thomas Wunder
2010-04-07 15:32 ` Andy Adamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004091115.27725.thomas.wunder@swt-bamberg.de \
--to=thomas.wunder@swt-bamberg.de \
--cc=kwc@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox