linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Jingwang <zhangjingwang@nrchpc.ac.cn>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bhalevy@panasas.com
Subject: [PATCH] pnfs: devide put_lseg and return_layout_barrier into different workqueue
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:59:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100517095941.GA10823@MDS-78.localdomain> (raw)

These two functions mustn't be called from the same workqueue. Otherwise
deadlock may occur. So we schedule the return_layout_barrier to nfsiod.
nfsiod may not be a good choice, maybe we should setup a new workqueue
to do the job.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Jingwang <zhangjingwang@nrchpc.ac.cn>
---
 fs/nfs/pnfs.c |   58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 5ad7fc6..d2b72be 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -1655,6 +1655,24 @@ pnfs_call_done(struct pnfs_call_data *pdata, struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
  * cleanup.
  */
 static void
+pnfs_write_retry(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct rpc_task *task;
+	struct nfs_write_data *wdata;
+	struct nfs4_pnfs_layout_segment range;
+
+	dprintk("%s enter\n", __func__);
+	task = container_of(work, struct rpc_task, u.tk_work);
+	wdata = container_of(task, struct nfs_write_data, task);
+	range.iomode = IOMODE_RW;
+	range.offset = wdata->args.offset;
+	range.length = wdata->args.count;
+	_pnfs_return_layout(wdata->inode, &range, NULL, RETURN_FILE);
+	pnfs_initiate_write(wdata, NFS_CLIENT(wdata->inode),
+			    wdata->pdata.call_ops, wdata->pdata.how);
+}
+
+static void
 pnfs_writeback_done(struct nfs_write_data *data)
 {
 	struct pnfs_call_data *pdata = &data->pdata;
@@ -1674,15 +1692,8 @@ pnfs_writeback_done(struct nfs_write_data *data)
 	}
 
 	if (pnfs_call_done(pdata, &data->task, data) == -EAGAIN) {
-		struct nfs4_pnfs_layout_segment range = {
-			.iomode = IOMODE_RW,
-			.offset = data->args.offset,
-			.length = data->args.count,
-		};
-		dprintk("%s: retrying\n", __func__);
-		_pnfs_return_layout(data->inode, &range, NULL, RETURN_FILE);
-		pnfs_initiate_write(data, NFS_CLIENT(data->inode),
-				    pdata->call_ops, pdata->how);
+		INIT_WORK(&data->task.u.tk_work, pnfs_write_retry);
+		queue_work(nfsiod_workqueue, &data->task.u.tk_work);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1798,6 +1809,24 @@ out:
  * read_pagelist is done
  */
 static void
+pnfs_read_retry(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct rpc_task *task;
+	struct nfs_read_data *rdata;
+	struct nfs4_pnfs_layout_segment range;
+
+	dprintk("%s enter\n", __func__);
+	task = container_of(work, struct rpc_task, u.tk_work);
+	rdata = container_of(task, struct nfs_read_data, task);
+	range.iomode = IOMODE_RW;
+	range.offset = rdata->args.offset;
+	range.length = rdata->args.count;
+	_pnfs_return_layout(rdata->inode, &range, NULL, RETURN_FILE);
+	pnfs_initiate_read(rdata, NFS_CLIENT(rdata->inode),
+			   rdata->pdata.call_ops);
+}
+
+static void
 pnfs_read_done(struct nfs_read_data *data)
 {
 	struct pnfs_call_data *pdata = &data->pdata;
@@ -1805,15 +1834,8 @@ pnfs_read_done(struct nfs_read_data *data)
 	dprintk("%s: Begin (status %d)\n", __func__, data->task.tk_status);
 
 	if (pnfs_call_done(pdata, &data->task, data) == -EAGAIN) {
-		struct nfs4_pnfs_layout_segment range = {
-			.iomode = IOMODE_ANY,
-			.offset = data->args.offset,
-			.length = data->args.count,
-		};
-		dprintk("%s: retrying\n", __func__);
-		_pnfs_return_layout(data->inode, &range, NULL, RETURN_FILE);
-		pnfs_initiate_read(data, NFS_CLIENT(data->inode),
-				   pdata->call_ops);
+		INIT_WORK(&data->task.u.tk_work, pnfs_read_retry);
+		queue_work(nfsiod_workqueue, &data->task.u.tk_work);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.6.2.5


             reply	other threads:[~2010-05-17 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-17  9:59 Zhang Jingwang [this message]
2010-05-17 10:33 ` [PATCH] pnfs: devide put_lseg and return_layout_barrier into different workqueue Boaz Harrosh
2010-05-17 10:36   ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-05-17 17:37   ` Zhang Jingwang
2010-05-17 18:21     ` Benny Halevy
2010-05-23  9:36       ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-05-23 18:27         ` Boaz Harrosh
     [not found]     ` <AANLkTimhsjIISik5KvAHDwbEWVdU_wrRPepfXYy30Brl-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-23 18:29       ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-05-24  2:14         ` Zhang Jingwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100517095941.GA10823@MDS-78.localdomain \
    --to=zhangjingwang@nrchpc.ac.cn \
    --cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).