From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, salvet@ics.muni.cz
Subject: Re: Deadlock in NFSv4 in all kernels
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 23:24:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100524212422.GA1286@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100507153920.GP28167@ics.muni.cz>
Hi!
> I encountered the following problem. We use short expiration time for
> kerberos contexts created by rpc.gssd (some patches were included in mainline
> nfs-utils). In particular, we use 120secs expiration time.
>
> Now, I run application that eats 80% of available RAM. Then I run 10 parallel
> dd processes that write data into NFS4 volume with sec=krb5.
>
> As soon as the kerberos context expires (i.e., up to 120 secs), the whole
> system gets stuck in do_page_fault and succesive functions. It is because
> there is no free memory in kernel, all free memory is used as cache for NFS4
> (due to dd traffic), kernel ask NFS to write back its pages but NFS cannot do
> anything as it is missing valid context. NFS contacts rpc.gssd to provide
> a renewed context, the rpc.gssd does not provide the context as it needs some memory
> to scan /tmp for a ticket. I.e., it deadlocks.
>
> Longer context expiration time is no real solution as it only makes the
> deadlock less often.
>
> Any ideas what can be done here? (Please cc me.) We could preallocate some
> memory in rpc.gssd and use mlockall but not sure whether this proctects also
> kernel malloc for things related to rpc.gssd and context creation (new file
> descriptors and so on).
>
> This is seen in 2.6.32 kernel but most probably this is related to all kernel
> versions.
Seems like pretty fundamental problem in nfs :-(. Limiting writeback
caches for nfs, so that system has enough memory to perform rpc calls
with the rest might do the trick, but...
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-24 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-07 15:39 Deadlock in NFSv4 in all kernels Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-05-24 21:24 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2010-05-25 12:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-25 12:58 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-05-25 13:39 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-25 14:07 ` Zdenek Salvet
2010-05-25 17:10 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-05-25 13:45 ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2010-05-25 14:02 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-05-25 14:10 ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2010-05-25 14:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-25 14:04 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100524212422.GA1286@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=salvet@ics.muni.cz \
--cc=xhejtman@ics.muni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).