From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] nfsd: fix error handling in write_ports interfaces
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:43:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100609064343.1f448bf2@corrin.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100609000002.GL26435@fieldses.org>
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:00:03 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:33:17AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > This patchset fixes some problems with refcounting when there are
> > problems starting up nfsd. The easiest way to reproduce this is to have
> > rpcbind down and then try to start nfsd. The write_ports calls will
> > generally return failure at that point due to the fact that lockd can't
> > register its ports. That leaves the nfsd_serv pointer set, with the
> > sv_threads count set at 0. The first two patches fix this problem.
>
> Does this look like it's always been a problem, or was it introduced by
> recent changes?
>
> (Just a question of priority and whether it should be fixed in -stable
> branches too.)
>
I think it's a long-standing bug -- at least since 2006 or so when the
portlist file was added, but some recent changes made it easier to hit.
Our QA group has a test where they restart both the nfs "service" and
rpcbind. With the recent change to using TCP to do rpcbind
registrations, the kernel now can hold open a socket to rpcbind for a
little while after doing the registration.
If you restart rpcbind within that window, it can fail to bind to port
111 as it didn't use SO_REUSEADDR. I recently proposed a patch to
rpcbind to fix that:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1275575657-9666-1-git-send-email-jlayton%40redhat.com&forum_name=libtirpc-devel
...portmap has a similar bug, but I haven't gotten around to fixing it
there yet.
Due to that problem, our QA group ended up trying to start nfsd with
rpcbind non-functional. When they got rpcbind to start, then they still
couldn't bring up nfsd immediately since nfsd_serv had already been
created and write_versions failed.
IMO, this set probably isn't stable material. It's a nuisance, but the
simple workaround is to just run "rpc.nfsd 0" and then you can start up
nfsd.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-09 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-07 15:33 [PATCH 0/3] nfsd: fix error handling in write_ports interfaces Jeff Layton
2010-06-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfsd: don't try to shut down nfs4 state handling unless it's up Jeff Layton
2010-06-08 23:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-06-09 10:29 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20100609062922.4bae21ac-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-09 18:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-06-09 18:29 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20100609142943.60d31a11-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-13 20:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-06-15 17:36 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20100615133622.10dad9f2-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 17:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-06-26 15:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20100626155351.GA16951-+qGSg9AQ1cLTsXDwO4sDpg@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-27 1:08 ` Jeff Layton
2010-06-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: fix error handling when starting nfsd with rpcbind down Jeff Layton
2010-06-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd: fix error handling in __write_ports_addxprt Jeff Layton
2010-06-09 0:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] nfsd: fix error handling in write_ports interfaces J. Bruce Fields
2010-06-09 10:43 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2010-06-09 0:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-06-09 10:55 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100609064343.1f448bf2@corrin.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox