From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] sunrpc/cache: allow threads to block while waiting for cache update.
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:04:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100812070405.11459.91402.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100812065722.11459.18978.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
The current practice of waiting for cache updates by queueing the
whole request to be retried has (at least) two problems.
1/ With NFSv4, requests can be quite complex and re-trying a whole
request when a later part fails should only be a last-resort, not a
normal practice.
2/ Large requests, and in particular any 'write' request, will not be
queued by the current code and doing so would be undesirable.
In many cases only a very sort wait is needed before the cache gets
valid data.
So, providing the underlying transport permits it by setting
->thread_wait,
arrange to wait briefly for an upcall to be completed (as reflected in
the clearing of CACHE_PENDING).
If the short wait was not long enough and CACHE_PENDING is still set,
fall back on the old approach.
The 'thread_wait' value is set to 5 seconds when there are spare
threads, and 1 second when there are no spare threads.
These values are probably much higher than needed, but will ensure
some forward progress.
Note that as we only request an update for a non-valid item, and as
non-valid items are updated in place it is extremely unlikely that
cache_check will return -ETIMEDOUT. Normally cache_defer_req will
sleep for a short while and then find that the item is_valid.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h | 3 +++
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 11 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
index 7bf3e84..61f521f 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
@@ -125,6 +125,9 @@ struct cache_detail {
*/
struct cache_req {
struct cache_deferred_req *(*defer)(struct cache_req *req);
+ int thread_wait; /* How long (jiffies) we can block the
+ * current thread to wait for updates.
+ */
};
/* this must be embedded in a deferred_request that is being
* delayed awaiting cache-fill
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index 2b06410..2fdd66b 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -509,10 +509,22 @@ static LIST_HEAD(cache_defer_list);
static struct list_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE];
static int cache_defer_cnt;
+struct thread_deferred_req {
+ struct cache_deferred_req handle;
+ struct completion completion;
+};
+static void cache_restart_thread(struct cache_deferred_req *dreq, int too_many)
+{
+ struct thread_deferred_req *dr =
+ container_of(dreq, struct thread_deferred_req, handle);
+ complete(&dr->completion);
+}
+
static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
{
struct cache_deferred_req *dreq, *discard;
int hash = DFR_HASH(item);
+ struct thread_deferred_req sleeper;
if (cache_defer_cnt >= DFR_MAX) {
/* too much in the cache, randomly drop this one,
@@ -521,7 +533,15 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
if (net_random()&1)
return -ENOMEM;
}
- dreq = req->defer(req);
+ if (req->thread_wait) {
+ dreq = &sleeper.handle;
+ sleeper.completion =
+ COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(sleeper.completion);
+ dreq->revisit = cache_restart_thread;
+ } else
+ dreq = req->defer(req);
+
+ retry:
if (dreq == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -555,6 +575,31 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
cache_revisit_request(item);
return -EAGAIN;
}
+
+ if (dreq == &sleeper.handle) {
+ wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
+ &sleeper.completion, req->thread_wait);
+ spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock);
+ if (!list_empty(&sleeper.handle.hash)) {
+ list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.recent);
+ list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.hash);
+ cache_defer_cnt--;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
+ if (test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &item->flags)) {
+ /* item is still pending, try request
+ * deferral
+ */
+ dreq = req->defer(req);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ /* only return success if we actually deferred the
+ * request. In this case we waited until it was
+ * answered so no deferral has happened - rather
+ * an answer already exists.
+ */
+ return -EEXIST;
+ }
return 0;
}
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index cbc0849..8ff6840 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -651,6 +651,11 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
if (signalled() || kthread_should_stop())
return -EINTR;
+ /* Normally we will wait up to 5 seconds for any required
+ * cache information to be provided.
+ */
+ rqstp->rq_chandle.thread_wait = 5*HZ;
+
spin_lock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
xprt = svc_xprt_dequeue(pool);
if (xprt) {
@@ -658,6 +663,12 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
svc_xprt_get(xprt);
rqstp->rq_reserved = serv->sv_max_mesg;
atomic_add(rqstp->rq_reserved, &xprt->xpt_reserved);
+
+ /* As there is a shortage of threads and this request
+ * had to be queue, don't allow the thread to wait so
+ * long for cache updates.
+ */
+ rqstp->rq_chandle.thread_wait = 1*HZ;
} else {
/* No data pending. Go to sleep */
svc_thread_enqueue(pool, rqstp);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-12 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 7:04 [PATCH 0/6] Cache deferral improvements - try N+2 NeilBrown
2010-08-12 7:04 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd/idmap: drop special request deferal in favour of improved default NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20100812070406.11459.89468.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-21 21:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] svcauth_gss: replace a trivial 'switch' with an 'if' NeilBrown
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: disable deferral for NFSv4 NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20100812070407.11459.2929.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-21 21:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] sunrpc: close connection when a request is irretrievably lost NeilBrown
2010-09-21 20:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-21 23:37 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22 2:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] sunrpc/cache: change deferred-request hash table to use hlist NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20100812065722.11459.18978.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-12 12:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] Cache deferral improvements - try N+2 J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 5:15 ` [PATCH 1.5/6] Fix race in new request delay code NeilBrown
2010-08-26 21:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-29 23:36 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-01 11:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-21 8:35 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22 2:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100812070405.11459.91402.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).