From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] sunrpc/cache: change deferred-request hash table to use hlist.
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:04:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100812070407.11459.94426.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100812065722.11459.18978.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Being a hash table, hlist is the best option.
There is currently some ugliness were we treat "->next == NULL" as
a special case to avoid having to initialise the whole array.
This change nicely gets rid of that case.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h | 2 +-
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
index 61f521f..5782154 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct cache_req {
* delayed awaiting cache-fill
*/
struct cache_deferred_req {
- struct list_head hash; /* on hash chain */
+ struct hlist_node hash; /* on hash chain */
struct list_head recent; /* on fifo */
struct cache_head *item; /* cache item we wait on */
void *owner; /* we might need to discard all defered requests
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index 2fdd66b..551ed44 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cache_purge);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cache_defer_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(cache_defer_list);
-static struct list_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE];
+static struct hlist_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE];
static int cache_defer_cnt;
struct thread_deferred_req {
@@ -551,9 +551,7 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
list_add(&dreq->recent, &cache_defer_list);
- if (cache_defer_hash[hash].next == NULL)
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache_defer_hash[hash]);
- list_add(&dreq->hash, &cache_defer_hash[hash]);
+ hlist_add_head(&dreq->hash, &cache_defer_hash[hash]);
/* it is in, now maybe clean up */
discard = NULL;
@@ -561,7 +559,7 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
discard = list_entry(cache_defer_list.prev,
struct cache_deferred_req, recent);
list_del_init(&discard->recent);
- list_del_init(&discard->hash);
+ hlist_del_init(&discard->hash);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
@@ -580,9 +578,9 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
&sleeper.completion, req->thread_wait);
spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&sleeper.handle.hash)) {
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(&sleeper.handle.hash)) {
list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.recent);
- list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.hash);
+ hlist_del_init(&sleeper.handle.hash);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
@@ -608,24 +606,20 @@ static void cache_revisit_request(struct cache_head *item)
struct cache_deferred_req *dreq;
struct list_head pending;
- struct list_head *lp;
+ struct hlist_node *lp, *tmp;
int hash = DFR_HASH(item);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pending);
spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock);
- lp = cache_defer_hash[hash].next;
- if (lp) {
- while (lp != &cache_defer_hash[hash]) {
- dreq = list_entry(lp, struct cache_deferred_req, hash);
- lp = lp->next;
+ hlist_for_each_entry_safe(dreq, lp, tmp,
+ &cache_defer_hash[hash], hash)
if (dreq->item == item) {
- list_del_init(&dreq->hash);
+ hlist_del_init(&dreq->hash);
list_move(&dreq->recent, &pending);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
- }
- }
+
spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
while (!list_empty(&pending)) {
@@ -646,7 +640,7 @@ void cache_clean_deferred(void *owner)
list_for_each_entry_safe(dreq, tmp, &cache_defer_list, recent) {
if (dreq->owner == owner) {
- list_del_init(&dreq->hash);
+ hlist_del_init(&dreq->hash);
list_move(&dreq->recent, &pending);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-12 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 7:04 [PATCH 0/6] Cache deferral improvements - try N+2 NeilBrown
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] sunrpc/cache: allow threads to block while waiting for cache update NeilBrown
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd/idmap: drop special request deferal in favour of improved default NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20100812070406.11459.89468.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-21 21:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] svcauth_gss: replace a trivial 'switch' with an 'if' NeilBrown
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: disable deferral for NFSv4 NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20100812070407.11459.2929.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-21 21:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-12 7:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] sunrpc: close connection when a request is irretrievably lost NeilBrown
2010-09-21 20:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-21 23:37 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22 2:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-12 7:04 ` NeilBrown [this message]
[not found] ` <20100812065722.11459.18978.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-12 12:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] Cache deferral improvements - try N+2 J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 5:15 ` [PATCH 1.5/6] Fix race in new request delay code NeilBrown
2010-08-26 21:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-29 23:36 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-01 11:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-21 8:35 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22 2:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100812070407.11459.94426.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).