From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:60178 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755534Ab0HaVuY (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:50:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:50:22 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Fred Isaman Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org Subject: Re: Linux pNFS status meeting 08/26 Message-ID: <20100831215022.GA27102@infradead.org> References: <4C761A61.2070203@panasas.com> <273FE88A07F5D445824060902F7003440C5CDD52@SACMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <20100831162648.GF3071@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:51:11AM -0700, Fred Isaman wrote: > Note that the not much touches the common code, especially in our > first submission, so it will be a fairly small patch, which we will > not be adverse to breaking up at reviewers request. Right now we are > trying to accommodate Cristoph's request for larger patches combined > with Trond's request for small, easy to review patches for anything > that touches common code. I'm not Cristoph, but for changes to generic code anywhere in the kernel small patches are indeed a requirement, adn they should do exactly one thing. Adding new code is a different issue from that.