From: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org,
Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make libtirpc work with old style portmapper
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:58:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009072258.22044.okir@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F1D592E6-35AD-45DA-B69E-044D59500DFB@oracle.com>
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 17:36:58 Chuck Lever wrote:
> Probably not a bad idea. But I thought this was a problem for applications
> that are calling rpcb_{un,}set(3t), not apps that are invoking the legacy
> variants. How does this new patch address the problem?
No, it's a problem with legacy apps calling pmap_set/unset. They simply
stop working if you use pmap_set + libtirpc + portmap.
> What happens if you try the other way around: try the AF_UNIX mechanism
> first, then the legacy mechanism? It's arguable that any application
> calling the pmap_{un,}set(3t) interface would likely expect the old
> behavior anyway, but could probably benefit from the additional security
> if rpcbind, rather than portmap, is running locally.
I don't think apps coded to the old pmap_* interface will benefit
in any way from the new security model. These services expect a
root/non-root split of privilege, and that's what they get with
PMAP_SET/UNSET, no matter whether they talk to rpcbind or portmap.
> 1. rpcb_{un,}set(3t) need to work whether rpcbind or portmapper are
> running 2. pmap_{un,}set(3t) should still invoke rpcb_{un,}set(3t) under
> the covers to ensure they get advanced security when available
>
> This is because you can build legacy apps against libtirpc (which want
> robust pmap_{un,}set(3t) no matter which portmapper is running), but you
> can also construct TI-RPC enabled apps that may be running on a system
> with only portmap (which want robust rpcb_{un,}set(3t)). So I think you
> have to fix both APIs.
The latter is a problem indeed, and I guess we need to fix it as well.
The one that I wanted to address first and foremost is applications
using the legacy API
Olaf
--
Neo didn't bring down the Matrix. SOA did. (soafacts.com)
--------------------------------------------
Olaf Kirch - Director Server (okir@novell.com)
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-07 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-30 13:03 [PATCH 0/2] Make libtirpc work with old style portmapper Olaf Kirch
2010-08-30 13:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] Introduce new helper function getpmaphandle Olaf Kirch
2010-08-30 13:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Olaf Kirch
2010-08-30 15:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] Make libtirpc work with old style portmapper Chuck Lever
2010-08-30 16:19 ` Olaf Kirch
2010-08-30 23:48 ` Chuck Lever
2010-09-07 11:27 ` Olaf Kirch
2010-09-07 15:36 ` Chuck Lever
2010-09-07 20:58 ` Olaf Kirch [this message]
2010-09-07 21:15 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009072258.22044.okir@suse.de \
--to=okir@suse.de \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox