public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Peter Skensved <peter@jay.phy.QueensU.CA>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsd4_stateowners problem
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100914200054.GC4148@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100914184044.GA30454@jay.phy.QueensU.CA>

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 02:40:44PM -0400, Peter Skensved wrote:
>  Thanks for the reply.  The current RedHat EL5 kernels are all based on 2.6.18 with
> a lot of backported fixes so I'm not sure what version of the NFS code I'm effectively
> running.
> 
>  Do you know what the state_owners are used for ? What puzzles me is that in our case

They represent some notion of "who" is performing an open, or performing
a lock.

> we have a large number of workstations which NFS mounts some fairly large, mostly static
> common directories and automounts HOME directories. So I would expect the amount of state
> info that needs to be kept would be fairly constant. When the automounter unmounts the
> info ought to go away . Yet the number of stateowners for the most part just keep on
> growing. 
> 
>  The only work around at the moment is to reboot before it has eaten up around 500 Mb
> of slabs

Is someone doing a lot of file locking?

I can't remember the logic the server uses to decide when to throw away
a lockowner, but it may just be inadequate.

The client has also had some fixes recently to be better about telling
the server when to throw them away.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-14 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-27 17:48 nfsd4_stateowners problem Peter Skensved
2010-09-14 17:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-14 18:40   ` Peter Skensved
2010-09-14 20:00     ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-09-14 20:24       ` Peter Skensved

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100914200054.GC4148@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@jay.phy.QueensU.CA \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox