linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] sunrpc/cache: centralise handling of size limit on deferred list.
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:31:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100922183154.GC26903@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100922025507.31745.61919.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:55:07PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> We limit the number of 'defer' requests to DFR_MAX.
> 
> The imposition of this limit is spread about a bit - sometime we don't
> add new things to the list, sometimes we remove old things.
> 
> Also it is currently applied to requests which we are 'waiting' for
> rather than 'deferring'.  This doesn't seem ideal as 'waiting'
> requests are naturally limited by the number of threads.
> 
> So gather the DFR_MAX handling code to one place and only apply it to
> requests that are actually being deferred.
> 
> This means that not all 'cache_deferred_req' structures go on the
> 'cache_defer_list, so we need to be careful when removing things.

The idea sounds OK.

> +static void cache_limit_defers(struct cache_deferred_req *dreq)
> +{
> +	/* Add 'dreq' to the list of deferred requests and make sure
> +	 * we don't exceed the limit of allowed deferred requests.
> +	 */
> +	struct cache_deferred_req *discard = NULL;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock);
> +	if (!list_empty(&dreq->recent) ||
> +	    hlist_unhashed(&dreq->hash)) {
> +		/* Must have lost a race, maybe cache_revisit_request is
> +		 * already processing this.  In any case, there is nothing for
> +		 * us to do.
> +		 */
> +		spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);

Did you mean to return here?

--b.

> +	}
> +
> +	/* First, add this to the list */
> +	cache_defer_cnt++;
> +	list_add(&dreq->recent, &cache_defer_list);
> +
> +	/* now consider removing either the first or the last */
> +	if (cache_defer_cnt > DFR_MAX) {
> +		if (net_random() & 1)
> +			discard = list_entry(cache_defer_list.next,
> +					     struct cache_deferred_req, recent);
> +		else
> +			discard = list_entry(cache_defer_list.prev,
> +					     struct cache_deferred_req, recent);
> +		__unhash_deferred_req(discard);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
> +	if (discard)
> +		discard->revisit(discard, 1);
> +}
> +

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-22 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-22  2:55 [PATCH 0/7] Assorted nfsd patches for 2.6.37 NeilBrown
2010-09-22  2:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] sunrpc: fix race in new cache_wait code NeilBrown
2010-09-22 17:50   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-23  3:00     ` Neil Brown
2010-09-23  3:25       ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-23 14:46         ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-01 23:09           ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-02  0:12             ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22  2:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] sunrpc/cache: fix recent breakage of cache_clean_deferred NeilBrown
     [not found]   ` <20100922025506.31745.74964.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-22 18:27     ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-22  2:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] sunrpc/cache: change deferred-request hash table to use hlist NeilBrown
2010-09-22  2:59   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-22  4:51     ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22  2:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] sunrpc/cache: centralise handling of size limit on deferred list NeilBrown
     [not found]   ` <20100922025507.31745.61919.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-22 18:31     ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-09-23  3:02       ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22  2:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] nfsd: allow deprecated interface to be compiled out NeilBrown
2010-09-22  2:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] sunrpc/cache: allow thread manager more control of whether threads can wait for upcalls NeilBrown
2010-09-22 18:36   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-23  3:23     ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22  2:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] nfsd: formally deprecate legacy nfsd syscall interface NeilBrown
     [not found]   ` <20100922025507.31745.57024.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-22  3:10     ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100922183154.GC26903@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).