From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] sunrpc/cache: centralise handling of size limit on deferred list.
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:31:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100922183154.GC26903@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100922025507.31745.61919.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:55:07PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> We limit the number of 'defer' requests to DFR_MAX.
>
> The imposition of this limit is spread about a bit - sometime we don't
> add new things to the list, sometimes we remove old things.
>
> Also it is currently applied to requests which we are 'waiting' for
> rather than 'deferring'. This doesn't seem ideal as 'waiting'
> requests are naturally limited by the number of threads.
>
> So gather the DFR_MAX handling code to one place and only apply it to
> requests that are actually being deferred.
>
> This means that not all 'cache_deferred_req' structures go on the
> 'cache_defer_list, so we need to be careful when removing things.
The idea sounds OK.
> +static void cache_limit_defers(struct cache_deferred_req *dreq)
> +{
> + /* Add 'dreq' to the list of deferred requests and make sure
> + * we don't exceed the limit of allowed deferred requests.
> + */
> + struct cache_deferred_req *discard = NULL;
> +
> + spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock);
> + if (!list_empty(&dreq->recent) ||
> + hlist_unhashed(&dreq->hash)) {
> + /* Must have lost a race, maybe cache_revisit_request is
> + * already processing this. In any case, there is nothing for
> + * us to do.
> + */
> + spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
Did you mean to return here?
--b.
> + }
> +
> + /* First, add this to the list */
> + cache_defer_cnt++;
> + list_add(&dreq->recent, &cache_defer_list);
> +
> + /* now consider removing either the first or the last */
> + if (cache_defer_cnt > DFR_MAX) {
> + if (net_random() & 1)
> + discard = list_entry(cache_defer_list.next,
> + struct cache_deferred_req, recent);
> + else
> + discard = list_entry(cache_defer_list.prev,
> + struct cache_deferred_req, recent);
> + __unhash_deferred_req(discard);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
> + if (discard)
> + discard->revisit(discard, 1);
> +}
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-22 2:55 [PATCH 0/7] Assorted nfsd patches for 2.6.37 NeilBrown
2010-09-22 2:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] sunrpc: fix race in new cache_wait code NeilBrown
2010-09-22 17:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-23 3:00 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-23 3:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-23 14:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-01 23:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-02 0:12 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22 2:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] sunrpc/cache: fix recent breakage of cache_clean_deferred NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20100922025506.31745.74964.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-22 18:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-22 2:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] sunrpc/cache: change deferred-request hash table to use hlist NeilBrown
2010-09-22 2:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-22 4:51 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22 2:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] sunrpc/cache: centralise handling of size limit on deferred list NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20100922025507.31745.61919.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-22 18:31 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-09-23 3:02 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22 2:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] nfsd: allow deprecated interface to be compiled out NeilBrown
2010-09-22 2:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] sunrpc/cache: allow thread manager more control of whether threads can wait for upcalls NeilBrown
2010-09-22 18:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-23 3:23 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-22 2:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] nfsd: formally deprecate legacy nfsd syscall interface NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20100922025507.31745.57024.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-22 3:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100922183154.GC26903@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).