From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: NFSv4 mounts take longer the fail from ENETUNREACH than NFSv3 mounts.
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:17:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101020181701.232dbeea@notabene> (raw)
If I don't have any network configured (except loop-back), and try an NFSv3
mount, then it fails quickly:
....
mount.nfs: portmap query failed: RPC: Remote system error - Network is unreachable
mount.nfs: Network is unreachable
If I try the same thing with a NFSv4 mount, it times out before it fails,
making a much longer delay.
This is because mount.nfs doesn't do a portmap lookup but just leaves
everything to the kernel.
The kernel does an 'rpc_ping()' which sets RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN.
So at least it doesn't retry after the timeout. But given that we have a
clear error, we shouldn't timeout at all.
Unfortunately I cannot see an easy way to fix this.
The place where ENETUNREACH is in xs_tcp_setup_socket. The comment there
says "Retry with the same socket after a delay". The "delay" bit is correct,
the "retry" isn't.
It would seem that we should just add a 'goto out' there if RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN
was set. However we cannot see the task at this point - in fact it seems
that there could be a queue of tasks waiting on this connection. I guess
some could be soft, and some not. ???
So: An suggestions how to get a ENETUNREACH (or ECONNREFUSED or similar) to
fail immediately when RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN is set ???
This affects people who upgrade from openSUSE11.2 (which didn't support v4
mounts) to openSUSE11.3 (which defaults to v4) and who use network-manager
(which configures networks late) and have NFS mounts in /etc/fstab with
either explicit IP addresses or host names that can be resolved without the
network.
This config will work because when the network comes up, network-manager will
re-run the 'init.d/nfs' script. However since 11.3 there is an unpleasant
pause before boot completes.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-20 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-20 7:17 Neil Brown [this message]
2010-10-20 14:29 ` NFSv4 mounts take longer the fail from ENETUNREACH than NFSv3 mounts Chuck Lever
2010-10-20 21:29 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21 0:56 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21 12:09 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 13:52 ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-21 14:10 ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-20 17:55 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-20 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-20 20:40 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21 0:45 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 3:25 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21 14:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21 14:31 ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-21 14:42 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21 19:40 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 19:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21 20:08 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 20:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-23 6:41 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101020181701.232dbeea@notabene \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox