Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: NFSv4 mounts take longer the fail from ENETUNREACH than NFSv3 mounts.
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:17:01 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101020181701.232dbeea@notabene> (raw)



If I don't have any network configured (except loop-back), and try an NFSv3
mount, then it fails quickly:


....
mount.nfs: portmap query failed: RPC: Remote system error - Network is unreachable
mount.nfs: Network is unreachable


If I try the same thing with a NFSv4 mount, it times out before it fails,
making a much longer delay.

This is because mount.nfs doesn't do a portmap lookup but just leaves
everything to the kernel.
The kernel does an 'rpc_ping()' which sets RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN.
So at least it doesn't retry after the timeout.  But given that we have a
clear error, we shouldn't timeout at all.

Unfortunately I cannot see an easy way to fix this.

The place where ENETUNREACH is in xs_tcp_setup_socket.  The comment there
says "Retry with the same socket after a delay".  The "delay" bit is correct,
the "retry" isn't.

It would seem that we should just add a 'goto out' there if RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN
was set.  However we cannot see the task at this point - in fact it seems
that there could be a queue of tasks waiting on this connection.  I guess
some could be soft, and some not. ???

So: An suggestions how to get a ENETUNREACH (or ECONNREFUSED or similar) to
fail immediately when  RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN is set ???


This affects people who upgrade from openSUSE11.2 (which didn't support v4
mounts) to openSUSE11.3 (which defaults to v4) and who use network-manager
(which configures networks late) and have NFS mounts in /etc/fstab with
either explicit IP addresses or host names that can be resolved without the
network.
This config will work because when the network comes up, network-manager will
re-run the 'init.d/nfs' script.  However since 11.3 there is an unpleasant
pause before boot completes.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

             reply	other threads:[~2010-10-20  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-20  7:17 Neil Brown [this message]
2010-10-20 14:29 ` NFSv4 mounts take longer the fail from ENETUNREACH than NFSv3 mounts Chuck Lever
2010-10-20 21:29   ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21  0:56     ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21 12:09       ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 13:52         ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-21 14:10       ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-20 17:55 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-20 19:16   ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-20 20:40     ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21  0:45       ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21  3:25         ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21 14:05           ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21 14:31             ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-21 14:42               ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21 19:40                 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 19:47                   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21 20:08                     ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 20:18                       ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-23  6:41                         ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101020181701.232dbeea@notabene \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox