linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFSv4 mounts take longer the fail from ENETUNREACH than NFSv3 mounts.
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:45:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101020204532.2019eb93@corrin.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101021074028.44bca336@notabene>

On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 07:40:28 +1100
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:

> > 
> > Then what happens is that xs_tcp_send_request gets called again to try
> > to resend the packet. In the EHOSTUNREACH case, that returns
> > EHOSTUNREACH which eventually causes an rpc_exit with that error. In
> > the ENETUNREACH case that returns EPIPE, which makes the state machine
> > move next to call_bind and the whole thing starts over again.
> 
> This confuses me.  Why would  xs_tcp_send_request (aka ->send_request) get
> called before the connect has succeeded?  Can you make sense of that?
> 

It confuses me too. I suspect that this may actually be a bug...

So EINPROGRESS makes the connect_worker task clear the connecting bit
and return. Eventually, the EHOSTUNREACH error is reported to
xs_error_report. That function does this:

        xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, -EAGAIN);

The task that was waiting on the connect_worker is then woken up.
call_connect_status does this:

        if (status >= 0 || status == -EAGAIN) {
                clnt->cl_stats->netreconn++;
                task->tk_action = call_transmit;
                return;
        }

...and we end up in call_transmit without the socket being connected.

So I understand how this happened, but I don't really understand the
design of the connect mechanism well enough to know whether this is
by design or not.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-21  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-20  7:17 NFSv4 mounts take longer the fail from ENETUNREACH than NFSv3 mounts Neil Brown
2010-10-20 14:29 ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-20 21:29   ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21  0:56     ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21 12:09       ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 13:52         ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-21 14:10       ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-20 17:55 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-20 19:16   ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-20 20:40     ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21  0:45       ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2010-10-21  3:25         ` Neil Brown
2010-10-21 14:05           ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21 14:31             ` Chuck Lever
2010-10-21 14:42               ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21 19:40                 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 19:47                   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21 20:08                     ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-21 20:18                       ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-23  6:41                         ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101020204532.2019eb93@corrin.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).