From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:41:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101026224107.GE1842@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101026221156.GD1842@fieldses.org>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 06:11:56PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 05:44:41PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:37:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:24 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I did a couple connectathon runs just now with no obvious ill effects
> > > > except for some sleep-within-spinlock warnings in the lease code.
> > >
> > > Hmm. Those sleep-within-spinlock warnings are very likely serious
> > > bugs.
> >
> > Yeah, didn't mean to belittle them.
> >
> > > Can you quote the whole warning with stack trace?
> >
> > It's just obvious allocations in setlease:
> >
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:3101
> > in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 4345, name: lease_tests
> > 1 lock held by lease_tests/4345:
> > #0: (file_lock_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81128be5>] lock_flocks+0x15/0x20
> > Pid: 4345, comm: lease_tests Not tainted 2.6.36-05858-gbd5e20b #1028
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffff8103141d>] __might_sleep+0x10d/0x140
> > [<ffffffff810e3ad3>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1f3/0x230
> > [<ffffffff8112a4d2>] generic_setlease+0x112/0x2c0
> > [<ffffffff8112a6b5>] __vfs_setlease+0x35/0x40
> > [<ffffffff8112acfe>] fcntl_setlease+0xce/0x180
> > [<ffffffff810f7c2e>] sys_fcntl+0x2fe/0x630
> > [<ffffffff81961999>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> > [<ffffffff81002658>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >
> > I'm testing a patch.
>
> This works for me.
>
> I'm not saying it's correct, but it does at least pass my dumb tests
> without complaining.
I can't think of any more missing locking, though I did notice this on a
quick look.
--b.
commit fc42117585672abd3cbf247dd311869233d1606a
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Oct 26 18:25:30 2010 -0400
fix nlmsvc_notify_blocked locking
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index 6f1ef00..c462d34 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -700,14 +700,16 @@ nlmsvc_notify_blocked(struct file_lock *fl)
struct nlm_block *block;
dprintk("lockd: VFS unblock notification for block %p\n", fl);
+ spin_lock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
list_for_each_entry(block, &nlm_blocked, b_list) {
if (nlm_compare_locks(&block->b_call->a_args.lock.fl, fl)) {
- nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 0);
+ nlmsvc_insert_block_locked(block, 0);
+ spin_unlock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
svc_wake_up(block->b_daemon);
return;
}
}
-
+ spin_unlock(&nlm_blocked_lock);
printk(KERN_WARNING "lockd: notification for unknown block!\n");
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-26 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-26 16:45 nfsd changes for 2.6.37 J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 17:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <AANLkTi=emsmLNFSV=j48d37JQxecQmNGZwY9OYdoKjeS-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-26 17:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 20:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-26 20:35 ` Bryan Schumaker
2010-10-26 20:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-26 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-26 21:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-26 21:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 22:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 22:41 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-10-27 7:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 8:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-27 13:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 14:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 14:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-27 15:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-27 15:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 15:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-27 16:12 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <AANLkTinTm-LwjfBfoFUyp5Dj8S2hexnHGQGpZiOWqyMY-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-27 16:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 17:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 18:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 18:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 19:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 20:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 20:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 20:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] locks: prevent ENOMEM on lease unlock J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] locks: fix leaks on setlease errors J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-31 11:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-01 17:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-01 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-01 18:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] locks: fix setlease methods to free passed-in lock J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd4: initialize delegation pointer to lease J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-31 2:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-31 3:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:40 ` nfsd changes for 2.6.37 Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-31 2:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-31 3:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-31 12:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-31 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] locks: let the caller free file_lock on ->setlease failure Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-03 20:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-04 1:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-04 1:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-06 19:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-06 19:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 16:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-31 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] locks: remove fl_copy_lock lock_manager operation Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-01 15:02 ` nfsd changes for 2.6.37 J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-06 19:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101026224107.GE1842@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).