linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd4: allow __d_obtain_alias() to return unhashed dentries
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:19:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101213051944.GA8688@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101203223326.GB28763@fieldses.org>

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 05:33:27PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> 
> Without this patch
> 
>        client$ mount -tnfs4 server:/export/ /mnt/
>        client$ tail -f /mnt/FOO
>        ...
>        server$ df -i /export
>        server$ rm /export/FOO
>        (^C the tail -f)
>        server$ df -i /export
>        server$ echo 2 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>        server$ df -i /export
> 
> the df's will show that the inode is not freed on the filesystem until
> the last step, when it could have been freed after killing the client's
> tail -f.  On-disk data won't be deallocated either, leading to possible
> spurious ENOSPC.
> 
> This occurs because when the client does the close, it arrives in a
> compound with a putfh and a close, processed like:
> 
>        - putfh: look up the filehandle.  The only alias found for the
>          inode will be DCACHE_UNHASHED alias referenced by the filp
>          associated with the nfsd open.  d_obtain_alias() doesn't like
>          this, so it creates a new DCACHE_DISCONECTED dentry and
>          returns that instead.
> 
> Nick Piggin suggested fixing this by allowing d_obtain_alias to return
> the unhashed dentry that is referenced by the filp, instead of making it
> create a new dentry.
> 
> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/dcache.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:00:16PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:32 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:56:22PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:48 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> > >> >> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:53:12PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > >> >>> Can you even put the link check into __d_find_alias?
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> -               if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || !d_unhashed(alias)) {
> > >> >>> +               if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || !inode->i_nlink ||
> > >> >>> !d_unhashed(alias)) {
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Something like that?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The immediate result of that would be for the close rpc (or any rpc's
> > >> >> sent after the file was unlinked) to fail with ESTALE.
> > >> >
> > >> > Why is that? Seems like it would be a bug, because a hashed dentry may
> > >> > be unhashed at any time concurrently to nfsd operation, so it should be
> > >> > able to tolerate that so long as it has a ref on the inode?
> > >>
> > >> Ping? Did you work out why nfs fails with ESTALE in that case? It seems
> > >> to work in my testing (and do the right thing with freeing the inode).
> > >
> > > Bah, sorry, I read too quickly, got the sense of the test backwards, and
> > > thought you were suggesting __d_find_alias() shouldn't return an alias
> > > in the i_nlink == 0 case!
> > >
> > > Yes, agreed, that should solve my problem.
> > 
> > OK, good.
> > 
> > > But what's the reason for the d_unhashed() check now?  Could we get rid
> > > of it entirely?
> > 
> > Well when the inode still has links I think we actually do want any new
> > references to go to hashed dentries. Definitely for d_splice_alias.
> 
> So here's a version with a changelog; objections?

Not sure where Al's hiding...

But I would like to update the comments, and perhaps even a new
add a new function here (or new flag to __d_find_alias).

AFAIKS, the callers are OK, however I suppose d_splice_alias and
d_materialise_unique should not have unlinked inodes at this point,
so at least a BUG_ON for them might be a good idea?

> 
> --b.
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index 23702a9..afa8a0d 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static struct dentry * __d_find_alias(struct inode *inode, int want_discon)
>  		next = tmp->next;
>  		prefetch(next);
>  		alias = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_alias);
> - 		if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || !d_unhashed(alias)) {
> +		if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || !inode->i_nlink || !d_unhashed(alias)) {
>  			if (IS_ROOT(alias) &&
>  			    (alias->d_flags & DCACHE_DISCONNECTED))
>  				discon_alias = alias;

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-13  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-12 18:43 lifetime of DCACHE_DISCONECTED dentries J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-13 11:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-15 17:48   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-16  6:45     ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-29  3:56       ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-29 19:32         ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-30  1:00           ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-30 18:39             ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-03 22:33             ` [PATCH] nfsd4: allow __d_obtain_alias() to return unhashed dentries J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-13  5:19               ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-12-14 22:01                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-17 17:53                   ` [PATCH] fs/dcache: use standard list macro for d_find_alias J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-17 18:00                   ` [PATCH 2/2] fs/dcache: allow __d_obtain_alias() to return unhashed dentries J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-18  2:01                     ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-18 16:16                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-19 14:53                         ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-27 23:46                           ` [PATCH] " J. Bruce Fields
2011-01-18 20:45                             ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-01-18 22:02                               ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-18 22:08                                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-08 18:13                                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-10 10:58                                     ` Al Viro
2011-03-11  4:07                                       ` NeilBrown
2012-02-14 17:03                                         ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-15 16:56                                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-16  3:06                                             ` NeilBrown
2012-02-16 11:51                                               ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-16 16:08                                                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-16 22:30                                               ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-17 16:34                                                 ` Peng Tao
2012-03-13 20:55                                                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-13 20:58                                                     ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: stop d_splice_alias creating directory aliases J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-13 20:58                                                     ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: remove unused __d_splice_alias argument J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-20  2:55                                                 ` [PATCH] fs/dcache: allow __d_obtain_alias() to return unhashed dentries NeilBrown
2012-02-29 23:10                                                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-28 13:59                                         ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-29 20:10                                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-29 20:29                                             ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-07-01 23:15                                               ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101213051944.GA8688@amd \
    --to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).