* 4.1 and rdma
@ 2010-12-14 21:03 J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2010-12-14 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs; +Cc: Tom Tucker
I asked Tom Tucker what he thought would be the minimum needed for our
4.1 implementation to be up-to-spec with regard to RDMA, and he took a
first look through the spec and made some notes:
http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/4.1_RDMA_issues
I don't know any big rush for 4.1/rdma, just wanted to make sure we
weren't doing anything that would make it hard to do it right later.
On the server side I think the safest thing to do may be just to return
an error on a CREATE_SESSION that arrives over an rdma connection, at
least until we figure out what more we'd need to do to support it
correctly?
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-12-14 21:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-14 21:03 4.1 and rdma J. Bruce Fields
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).