linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "William A. (Andy) Adamson" <androsadamson@gmail.com>
Cc: trond.myklebust@netapp.com, bfields@redhat.com,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH_V4 1/9] SUNRPC new transport for the NFSv4.1 shared back channel
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:10:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101217191037.GA14510@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=yKirVoRTEsz9s=8nQHPXR0C52DQHK-nz7Q82j@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 01:57:50PM -0500, William A. (Andy) Adamson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:54 PM, William A. (Andy) Adamson
> <androsadamson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:40 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 01:20:02PM -0500, andros@netapp.com wrote:
> >>> From: Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
> >>>
> >>> Create a new transport for the shared back channel.l Move the current sock
> >>> create and destroy routines into the new transport ops.
> >>>
> >>> Reference the back channel transport across message processing (recv/send).
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h |    1 +
> >>>  net/sunrpc/svc.c               |   18 +++---
> >>>  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c           |  122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>>  3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> >>> index 1b353a7..3a45a80 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> >>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ int         svc_sock_names(struct svc_serv *serv, char *buf,
> >>>  int          svc_addsock(struct svc_serv *serv, const int fd,
> >>>                                       char *name_return, const size_t len);
> >>>  void         svc_init_xprt_sock(void);
> >>> +void         svc_init_bc_xprt_sock(void);
> >>>  void         svc_cleanup_xprt_sock(void);
> >>>  struct svc_xprt *svc_sock_create(struct svc_serv *serv, int prot);
> >>>  void         svc_sock_destroy(struct svc_xprt *);
> >>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> >>> index 6359c42..3520cb3 100644
> >>> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> >>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> >>> @@ -488,10 +488,6 @@ svc_destroy(struct svc_serv *serv)
> >>>       if (svc_serv_is_pooled(serv))
> >>>               svc_pool_map_put();
> >>>
> >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1)
> >>> -     svc_sock_destroy(serv->bc_xprt);
> >>> -#endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
> >>> -
> >>>       svc_unregister(serv);
> >>>       kfree(serv->sv_pools);
> >>>       kfree(serv);
> >>> @@ -1264,7 +1260,7 @@ bc_svc_process(struct svc_serv *serv, struct rpc_rqst *req,
> >>>  {
> >>>       struct kvec     *argv = &rqstp->rq_arg.head[0];
> >>>       struct kvec     *resv = &rqstp->rq_res.head[0];
> >>> -     int             error;
> >>> +     int             ret;
> >>>
> >>>       /* Build the svc_rqst used by the common processing routine */
> >>>       rqstp->rq_xprt = serv->bc_xprt;
> >>> @@ -1292,12 +1288,16 @@ bc_svc_process(struct svc_serv *serv, struct rpc_rqst *req,
> >>>       svc_getu32(argv);       /* XID */
> >>>       svc_getnl(argv);        /* CALLDIR */
> >>>
> >>> -     error = svc_process_common(rqstp, argv, resv);
> >>> -     if (error <= 0)
> >>> -             return error;
> >>> +     /* Hold a reference to the back channel socket across the call */
> >>> +     svc_xprt_get(serv->bc_xprt);
> >>
> >> Either we already have a reference, in which case this is unnecessary,
> >> or we don't, in which case this is risky.
> >
> > This is done so that when svc_xprt_put is called due to an svc_drop
> > (svc_xprt_release, svc_xprt_put) it is not freed.  It's not risky
> > because AFAICS it's the way the rpc server code is intended to work.
> > Note that svc_recv calls svc_xprt_get, and svc_send calls svc_xprt_put
> > for the same reason.

The svc_xprt_put()'s in svc_send/svc_drop balance the get in svc_recv().
They're needed because on a normal server connections can come and go
(because clients come and go) during the lifetime of the server.

As I understand it, the client is just creating a new server for each
backchannel.  So the server will never outlive the one connection it
uses.  So you don't need that stuff.  It's harmless--just leave it
alone--but definitely don't try to add additional reference counting
during the processing.

--b.

> 
> I take it back - as written, it might be risky :) Perhaps I should
> make sure that the xpt_ref = 1 before returning from bc_svc_process.
> 
> -->Andy
> >
> >> The nfs client code knows when it wants to create and destroy the
> >> backchannel, so I think all you want is to create the svc_xprt when you
> >> create the backchannel and then put it once when you bring it down.
> >
> > Correct, and without the references in bc_svc_process, svc_drop == freeing.
> >
> > -->Andy
> >>
> >> --b.
> >>
> >>> +     ret = svc_process_common(rqstp, argv, resv);
> >>> +     if (ret <= 0)
> >>> +             return ret;
> >>>
> >>>       memcpy(&req->rq_snd_buf, &rqstp->rq_res, sizeof(req->rq_snd_buf));
> >>> -     return bc_send(req);
> >>> +     ret = bc_send(req);
> >>> +     svc_xprt_put(serv->bc_xprt);
> >>> +     return ret;
> >>>  }
> >>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(bc_svc_process);
> >>>  #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
> >>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> >>> index 07919e1..5875551 100644
> >>> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> >>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> >>> @@ -66,6 +66,13 @@ static void                svc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *);
> >>>  static struct svc_xprt *svc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, int,
> >>>                                         struct net *, struct sockaddr *,
> >>>                                         int, int);
> >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1)
> >>> +static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, int,
> >>> +                                          struct net *, struct sockaddr *,
> >>> +                                          int, int);
> >>> +static void svc_bc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *xprt);
> >>> +#endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
> >>> +
> >>>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> >>>  static struct lock_class_key svc_key[2];
> >>>  static struct lock_class_key svc_slock_key[2];
> >>> @@ -1184,6 +1191,79 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_tcp_create(struct svc_serv *serv,
> >>>       return svc_create_socket(serv, IPPROTO_TCP, net, sa, salen, flags);
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1)
> >>> +static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, int,
> >>> +                                          struct net *, struct sockaddr *,
> >>> +                                          int, int);
> >>> +static void svc_bc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *xprt);
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_tcp_create(struct svc_serv *serv,
> >>> +                                    struct net *net,
> >>> +                                    struct sockaddr *sa, int salen,
> >>> +                                    int flags)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     return svc_bc_create_socket(serv, IPPROTO_TCP, net, sa, salen, flags);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void svc_bc_tcp_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> >>> +{
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/* These bc ops are never called. The shared fore channel is used instead */
> >>> +static int svc_bc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int svc_bc_tcp_sendto(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void svc_bc_tcp_prep_reply_hdr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >>> +{
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void svc_bc_release_skb(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >>> +{
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int svc_bc_tcp_has_wspace(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_tcp_accept(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     return NULL;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_tcp_bc_ops = {
> >>> +     .xpo_create = svc_bc_tcp_create,
> >>> +     .xpo_recvfrom = svc_bc_tcp_recvfrom,
> >>> +     .xpo_sendto = svc_bc_tcp_sendto,
> >>> +     .xpo_release_rqst = svc_bc_release_skb,
> >>> +     .xpo_detach = svc_bc_tcp_sock_detach,
> >>> +     .xpo_free = svc_bc_sock_free,
> >>> +     .xpo_prep_reply_hdr = svc_bc_tcp_prep_reply_hdr,
> >>> +     .xpo_has_wspace = svc_bc_tcp_has_wspace,
> >>> +     .xpo_accept = svc_bc_tcp_accept,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct svc_xprt_class svc_tcp_bc_class = {
> >>> +     .xcl_name = "tcp-bc",
> >>> +     .xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >>> +     .xcl_ops = &svc_tcp_bc_ops,
> >>> +     .xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +void svc_init_bc_xprt_sock(void)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     svc_reg_xprt_class(&svc_tcp_bc_class);
> >>> +}
> >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_init_bc_xprt_sock);
> >>> +#endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
> >>> +
> >>>  static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_tcp_ops = {
> >>>       .xpo_create = svc_tcp_create,
> >>>       .xpo_recvfrom = svc_tcp_recvfrom,
> >>> @@ -1509,41 +1589,43 @@ static void svc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> >>>       kfree(svsk);
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1)
> >>>  /*
> >>> - * Create a svc_xprt.
> >>> - *
> >>> - * For internal use only (e.g. nfsv4.1 backchannel).
> >>> - * Callers should typically use the xpo_create() method.
> >>> + * Create a back channel svc_xprt which shares the fore channel socket.
> >>>   */
> >>> -struct svc_xprt *svc_sock_create(struct svc_serv *serv, int prot)
> >>> +static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *serv,
> >>> +                                          int protocol,
> >>> +                                          struct net *net,
> >>> +                                          struct sockaddr *sin, int len,
> >>> +                                          int flags)
> >>>  {
> >>>       struct svc_sock *svsk;
> >>> -     struct svc_xprt *xprt = NULL;
> >>> +     struct svc_xprt *xprt;
> >>> +
> >>> +     if (protocol != IPPROTO_TCP) {
> >>> +             printk(KERN_WARNING "svc: only and TCP sockets"
> >>> +                     " supported on shared back channel\n");
> >>> +             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >>> +     }
> >>>
> >>> -     dprintk("svc: %s\n", __func__);
> >>>       svsk = kzalloc(sizeof(*svsk), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>       if (!svsk)
> >>> -             goto out;
> >>> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >>>
> >>>       xprt = &svsk->sk_xprt;
> >>> -     if (prot == IPPROTO_TCP)
> >>> -             svc_xprt_init(&svc_tcp_class, xprt, serv);
> >>> -     else if (prot == IPPROTO_UDP)
> >>> -             svc_xprt_init(&svc_udp_class, xprt, serv);
> >>> -     else
> >>> -             BUG();
> >>> -out:
> >>> -     dprintk("svc: %s return %p\n", __func__, xprt);
> >>> +     svc_xprt_init(&svc_tcp_bc_class, xprt, serv);
> >>> +
> >>> +     serv->bc_xprt = xprt;
> >>> +
> >>>       return xprt;
> >>>  }
> >>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_sock_create);
> >>>
> >>>  /*
> >>> - * Destroy a svc_sock.
> >>> + * Free a back channel svc_sock.
> >>>   */
> >>> -void svc_sock_destroy(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> >>> +static void svc_bc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> >>>  {
> >>>       if (xprt)
> >>>               kfree(container_of(xprt, struct svc_sock, sk_xprt));
> >>>  }
> >>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_sock_destroy);
> >>> +#endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
> >>> --
> >>> 1.6.6
> >>>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-17 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-17 18:20 [PATCH_V4 0/9] NFSv4 callback find client fix Version 4 andros
2010-12-17 18:20 ` [PATCH_V4 1/9] SUNRPC new transport for the NFSv4.1 shared back channel andros
2010-12-17 18:20   ` [PATCH_V4 2/9] NFS use svc_create_xprt for NFSv4.1 callback service andros
2010-12-17 18:20     ` [PATCH_V4 3/9] NFS do not clear minor version at nfs_client free andros
2010-12-17 18:20       ` [PATCH_V4 4/9] NFS implement v4.0 callback_ident andros
2010-12-17 18:20         ` [PATCH_V4 5/9] NFS associate sessionid with callback connection andros
2010-12-17 18:20           ` [PATCH_V4 6/9] NFS reference nfs_client across cb_compound processing andros
2010-12-17 18:20             ` [PATCH_V4 7/9] NFS RPC_AUTH_GSS unsupported on v4.1 back channel andros
2010-12-17 18:20               ` [PATCH_V4 8/9] NFS add session back channel draining andros
2010-12-17 18:20                 ` [PATCH_V4 9/9] NFS rename client back channel transport field andros
2010-12-20 14:05             ` [PATCH_V4 6/9] NFS reference nfs_client across cb_compound processing Benny Halevy
2010-12-20 15:44             ` Fred Isaman
2010-12-17 18:40   ` [PATCH_V4 1/9] SUNRPC new transport for the NFSv4.1 shared back channel J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-17 18:54     ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2010-12-17 18:57       ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2010-12-17 19:10         ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-12-17 19:16           ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2010-12-17 19:33             ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-17 19:55               ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2010-12-17 20:02                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-17 20:11                   ` William A. (Andy) Adamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101217191037.GA14510@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=androsadamson@gmail.com \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).