From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
andros@netapp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd41: modify the members value of nfsd4_op_flags
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 12:11:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110307171114.GE6718@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D5DC6E2.5070307@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:09:54AM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
>
>
> Benny Halevy 写道:
> > BTW, any particular reason you sent this to Chuck and not Bruce <bfields@redhat.com>
> > who's the nfs server maintainer?
>
> Sorry for my mistake.
>
> >
> > On 2011-02-17 04:02, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> >> The members of nfsd4_op_flags, (ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS)
> >> equals to ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP, maybe that's not what we want.
> >>
> >> OP_PUTROOTFH with op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS,
> >> can't appears as the first operation with out SEQUENCE ops.
> >>
> >> This patch modify the wrong value of ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH etc which
> >> was introduced by f9bb94c4.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 6 +++---
> >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> >> index db52546..8605d38 100644
> >> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> >> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> >> @@ -983,9 +983,9 @@ static inline void nfsd4_increment_op_stats(u32 opnum)
> >> typedef __be32(*nfsd4op_func)(struct svc_rqst *, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
> >> void *);
> >> enum nfsd4_op_flags {
> >> - ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 0, /* No current filehandle required */
> >> - ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 2 << 0, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> >> - ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 3 << 0, /* ops reqired first in compound */
> >> + ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 1, /* No current filehandle required */
> >> + ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 1 << 2, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> >> + ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 1 << 3, /* ops reqired first in compound */
> >
> > Right, just 1 << {0,1,2} would make more sense :)
>
> Thanks for your advice.
Thanks for catching this, and apologies for the delay; queueing up for
2.6.39.
--b.
>
> --------------------------------------------
> >From b01bae649293d160af07dde30fde6aa3ac7f8759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:08:31 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] nfsd41: modify the members value of nfsd4_op_flags
>
> The members of nfsd4_op_flags, (ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS)
> equals to ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP, maybe that's not what we want.
>
> OP_PUTROOTFH with op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS,
> can't appears as the first operation with out SEQUENCE ops.
>
> This patch modify the wrong value of ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH etc which
> was introduced by f9bb94c4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> index db52546..5fcb139 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -984,8 +984,8 @@ typedef __be32(*nfsd4op_func)(struct svc_rqst *, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
> void *);
> enum nfsd4_op_flags {
> ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 0, /* No current filehandle required */
> - ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 2 << 0, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> - ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 3 << 0, /* ops reqired first in compound */
> + ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 1 << 1, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> + ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 1 << 2, /* ops reqired first in compound */
> };
>
> struct nfsd4_operation {
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-07 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-17 9:02 [PATCH] nfsd41: modify the members value of nfsd4_op_flags Mi Jinlong
2011-02-17 13:41 ` Benny Halevy
2011-02-18 1:09 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-07 17:11 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110307171114.GE6718@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=andros@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).