From: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Mark Moseley <moseleymark@gmail.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] more vfs fixes for final
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:09:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110312010930.GD8211@hostway.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110311213519.GA9404@fieldses.org>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:35:19PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:09:38PM -0800, Simon Kirby wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:58:56AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > > commit d891eedbc3b1b0fade8a9ce60cc0eba1cccb59e5
> > > Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
> > > Date: Tue Jan 18 15:45:09 2011 -0500
> > >
> > > fs/dcache: allow d_obtain_alias() to return unhashed dentries
> >
> > Hmm, I was hoping this or something recently would fix nfs_inode_cache
> > growing forever and flush processes taking lots of system time since
> > 2.6.36. For example:
> >
> > OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
> > 3457486 3454365 99% 0.95K 105601 33 3379232K nfs_inode_cache
> > 469638 248761 52% 0.10K 12042 39 48168K buffer_head
> > 243712 216348 88% 0.02K 952 256 3808K kmalloc-16
> > 232785 202185 86% 0.19K 11085 21 44340K dentry
> > 149696 54633 36% 0.06K 2339 64 9356K kmalloc-64
> > 115976 106806 92% 0.55K 4142 28 66272K radix_tree_node
> > 76064 45680 60% 0.12K 2377 32 9508K kmalloc-128
> > 62336 53427 85% 0.03K 487 128 1948K kmalloc-32
> > 41958 41250 98% 0.75K 1998 21 31968K ext3_inode_cache
> >
> > This clears them all, similar to what you posted:
> >
> > echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > sync
> > echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> >
> > ...but 2.6.38-rc8 still doesn't seem to fix it.
> >
> > http://0x.ca/sim/ref/2.6.37/cpu3_nfs.png
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg18212.html
> >
> > Any ideas? This started with 2.6.36.
>
> Do you have NFSv4 clients that are doing locking? Then it's probably
> 0997b17360 and 529d7b2a7f on the for-2.6.39 branch at:
>
> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-2.6.39
>
> Let me know if not.
Yes, but when this started, it was all NFSv3. I tried NFSv4 to see if
it made any different (no, other than more I/O wait due to idmapd and
flock(LOCK_EX) breaking on a file opened O_RDONLY, which works locally
and on NFSv3 -- fixed by changing to open(O_RDWR) in my code), but
otherwise NFSv3 and NFSv4 look pretty much the same and "leak" at the
same rate.
Actually, I only changed the mount where it writes the log results, and
not where it reads them from (a bunch of NFSv3 mounts that will take a
lot more work to make NFSv4 since they currently run without libnss-mysql
set up), so I haven't actually tested to see if it happens with purely
NFSv4 mounts.
Anyway, it's locking on one file only, and it was purely for reducing
writeback thrashing, so I could try without it if you think it might be
related, but it all started without NFSv4. All this thing does is read a
bunch of log files, crunch them into reports, and write them to another
mount point, all run from xargs -P. Pretty basic readdir, read, write,
unlink...not anything exotic.
Simon-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-12 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110310110931.GF22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <AANLkTi=gv+iT6Lc_ADoBu9_P78ivhmOwLh-+Oki7WmD1@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20110310115856.GG22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
2011-03-11 21:09 ` [git pull] more vfs fixes for final Simon Kirby
2011-03-11 21:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-12 1:09 ` Simon Kirby [this message]
2011-03-15 0:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-16 5:19 ` Simon Kirby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110312010930.GD8211@hostway.ca \
--to=sim@hostway.ca \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moseleymark@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).